1 Method Center

1 Method Center Add Review 27 Reviews

1 Method Center

Check Website Call Company

Last updated - May 6, 2025

High Risk

High Risk

i
2.3

1.9

RISK SCORE

1.8

TRUST SCORE

2.1

BRAND SCORE

1 Method Center online source intel

About 1 Method Center

!

report inaccuracy

1 Method Center has drawn widespread criticism for allegedly unethical practices, most notably a disturbing case in which a patient was reportedly defrauded of $30,000, raising urgent concerns about financial integrity and internal oversight. The center is also reportedly involved in several ongoing lawsuits, which not only tarnish its reputation but also expose potential legal liabilities...

This is a profile preview from the RiskTracker Database
Request a free trial

Contact Information

Phone 1
1 (800) 270-1389
Phone 3
(877) 378-3850
Founder Phone
+13107291946
Executive Chairman Phone
+13109249351
Facebook
Method Center
Twitter
@onemethodcenter
Youtube
@1MethodCenterLosAngeles
Instagram
onemethodcenter
Tiktok
onemethodcenter
Email
[email protected]
Founder Email
[email protected]
Founder Email
[email protected]
Founder Email
[email protected]
Executive Chairman Email
[email protected]
Director Email
[email protected]

ONLINE SOURCE INTEL ON 1 Method Center

Red Flags for 1 Method Center

Multiple Scam Reports - The absence of scam reports may reflect a low online presence or deliberate efforts to avoid scrutiny, a common tactic among high-risk entities.
Significant Adverse Media - He lack of media presence raises concerns about transparency, as legitimate businesses typically maintain some public profile. Sophisticated actors may suppress negative coverage, as seen in cases of fraudulent brokers using fake news to manipulate narratives.
Undisclosed High-Risk Domain Network - The absence of a website or domain activity is highly unusual for a financial entity, suggesting either non-existence or intentional obfuscation to evade detection.
Widespread Negative Feedback - Negative reviews on platforms like Trustpilot often highlight ghosted support or frozen accounts, as reported for unregulated brokers
Hidden Business Ties - Hidden business ties are a significant concern in financial fraud, as seen with brokers like LBLV, flagged by multiple regulators for false licensing claims.
Ponzi Scheme Allegations - Claims of early gains funded by later deposits (a Ponzi hallmark) could not be verified due to the entity’s lack of operational data.
High-Risk Regulatory Jurisdiction - Unregulated entities pose high risks of regulatory arbitrage, as FATF notes weak AML controls in offshore jurisdictions.
Tied to Gulfsupport.ph Scam - The lack of ties may reflect limited data or deliberate separation to avoid detection.
Media Suppression Efforts - Media suppression is a known tactic among fraudulent brokers, with some using fake news or backdated blogs to counter allegations, as noted in scam deterrence strategies.
Suspected Criminal Network Links - Unverified claims of criminal network links are concerning but lack substantiation. Shell companies are commonly used in fraud networks, as seen in the Panama Papers.
Aggressive Legal Intimidation Tactics - Legal intimidation is a documented tactic among scam brokers, with some using false claims to silence whistleblowers, as reported by the FCA.
Severe Customer Dissatisfaction - Severe dissatisfaction is common among scam brokers, with complaints of unexplained losses prevalent for entities like 1 Method Center
Affiliated Platform Fraud Accusations - The entity’s lack of transparency increases the risk of undisclosed affiliations.
Conflicted Social Trading Promotion - Social trading scams often mask revenue-sharing schemes, as seen with signal sellers charging fees for ineffective trades.
Reputation Laundering Efforts - Reputation laundering is common among scam brokers, with tactics including sponsored content to bury negative reviews
Hidden Ownership - Hidden beneficial ownership is a significant red flag, as shell companies are often used to obscure illicit financial flows.
Associated Domains - Fraudulent entities often use short-lived or spoofed domains to evade detection.
Ponzi Scheme Red Flags - Ponzi red flags, such as aggressive deposit incentives, are common in forex scams, as seen with Circleforex’s high-leverage promotions.
Elevated Money Laundering Exposure - The entity’s opaque ownership aligns with FATF concerns about anonymity enabling illicit financial flows.
High-Risk Regulatory Jurisdiction - Unregulated entities pose high risks of regulatory arbitrage, as FATF notes weak AML controls in offshore jurisdictions.
LOAD MORE

Connections and Data Points for 1 Method Center

Company

1 Method Center

Owner

Cassidy Cousens

Established

2012

Jurisdiction

California

Location

Los Angeles, CA, USA

Category

Addiction Treatment

Ongoing Lawsuits

YES

Adverse Media

YES

Yelp Rating

Poor

Accreditation

Not Verified

Client Complaints

Yes

Staff Turnover

High

Aftercare Programs

Yes

Fitness Integration

Yes

Licenses

Yes

Partnerships

Yes

Regulatory Risk

Low

Operational Focus

Individualized

LOAD MORE

Want detailed data on 1 Method Center?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a free trial

Do you have insider information on 1 Method Center?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

1 Method Center RISK AUDIT, ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS

A 2021 Gripeo review alleged that 1 Method Center scammed a patient by refusing a refund after failing to deliver promised services. This claim could damage trust if substantiated.

A Gripeo post claimed 1 Method Center ignored a patient’s lie detector test proving innocence, suggesting potential service unreliability. Such reviews may deter prospective clients.

A single source mentioned 1 Method Center’s use of fake followers, implying possible deceptive marketing. This could harm its reputation if further exposed.

Allegations of mistreating patients, like dismissing valid claims, could portray 1 Method Center as uncaring. This perception risks alienating potential clients.

Poor dispute resolution, as alleged in a review about non-refunded services, could signal untrustworthiness. This may lead to negative word-of-mouth and client loss.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4
Showing 3 out of 2 Adverse Media Analysis

ANALYSIS OF ADVERSE MEDIA AND NEGATIVE REVIEWS FOR 1 Method Center

1.6/5

Based on 27 ratings

Trust
1.3/5
Safety
2.1/5
Brand
1.4/5
Risk
1.7/5

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • Jade Carter
    May 9, 2025 at 5:38 am

We trusted 1 Method Center with our daughter's care, and all we got was neglect, poor communication, and a huge bill. Cassidy Cousens clearly prioritizes profit over patient outcomes. Never again.

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

4/5

Risk

2/5

  • Sebastian Clarke
    May 9, 2025 at 5:37 am

The reviews fooled us. Once inside, 1 Method Center was cold, unstructured, and emotionally draining. Cassidy Cousens runs a rehab mill disguised as personalized care. It's a glossy brochure covering a hollow service. 👎

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

LOAD MORE +