trust score
brand audit
user’s score
user reviews
Name1 Method Center | Industry Mental Health Care | Program Options #1Detoxification | Program Options #2Residential |
Program Options #3Outpatient | Program Options #4Aftercare | Company Size11-50 employees | Headquarters Los Angeles, California |
Founded 2014 | Allegations #1Spam | Allegations #2Fraudulent Actions | Allegations #3Harassment |
Allegations #4Untrustworthy | Specialties #1Dual Diagnosis Treatment | Specialties #2Drug Rehab | Specialties #3Alcohol Rehab |
Specialties #4Drug Detoxification | Linkedin Yes | Facebook Yes | X (Twitter) Yes |
Negative Reviews Online Yes (multiple) | Risk Factor 0.94 | Adverse Media Yes | Brand Awareness Medium |
1 Method Center has a consumer rating of N/A stars from 0 consumer complaints and reviews indicating that most customers are NOT satisfied with their experience. Consumers unhappy with 1 Method Center most frequently mention bad support and high costs.
articles
images
social posts
videos
files
The patient gave their consent to be admitted to the facility, but during their stay—which lasted from the moment they started taking prescription drugs until they awoke in the UCLA hospital with injuries—they suffered from memory loss. Their memory was restored when they stopped taking all of their meds. They asked to have no more communication with the facility to protect their mental health. They were troubled, meanwhile, by the unwanted communication they kept getting, which included surveys and spam. For their protection, they warn people to avoid them and beg named persons to cease communicating with them.
Name 1 Method Center | Posted on 8 Aug, 2023 | Posted byYeweng W. | Posted fromMidtown West, New York, NY |
Hospital NameUCLA hospital | Patient Suffered FromMemory Loss | Patient Suffered FromMental Health | Allegations #1Unwanted Communication |
Allegations #2Spam | Allegations #3Causing Distress | Source Reliability Medium | SERP >10 |
Search Visibility Low | Brand Impact Low |
Top 3 negative keyword association :
The person issues a warning to others, characterizing a certain facility as providing subpar care and services. They claim that Cassidy, the owner, participates in unethical activities like ferociously haggling over costs and making up schemes to deceive insurance policies. They also assert that the clinic harasses patients after they submit positive evaluations by pressuring them to do so. The person singles out Ryan and Cassidy as dishonest people who take advantage of weak people and don’t follow through on treatment or care commitments. They label the owners as amateur scam artists and advise against entrusting one’s sobriety or the sobriety of loved ones to this establishment.
Posted byWilliam K. SoMa | Posted on Feb 15, 2024 | Posted fromSan Francisco, CA | Allegations #1Questionable Practices |
Allegations #2Fraudulent Actions | Allegations #3Manipulate Insurance Coverage | Allegations #4Harassment | Allegations #5Untrustworthy |
Allegations #6Exploit Vulnerable | Allegations #7Fail to deliver promised treatments and care | Source Reliability Medium | SERP >10 |
Search Visibility Low | Brand ImpactLow |
Top 3 negative keyword association :
Already have an account? login
Leave a Reply