Apex Capital Group

Marked as

Low Risk Company

Last updated - December 9, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.0

1.7

User Score

3.2

Trust Score

3.6

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Apex Capital Group

Apex Capital Group, operating under investwithapex.com, has drawn sharp criticism for its opaque operations and unverifiable claims about real estate deals, lacking basic disclosures on establishment, revenue, and regulatory compliance that scream high-risk involvement.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Apex Capital Group?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Shomail Malik
eyeimg

Established

2008
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

New Jersey
eyeimg

Headquarter

Kendall Park, New Jersey
eyeimg

Sanctions

Unclear
eyeimg

Lawsuits

Present
eyeimg

Bankruptcy

Unmonitored
eyeimg

Transparency

Low
eyeimg

Regulatory Mentions

Omitted
eyeimg

Licensing Scope

Limited
eyeimg

Transaction Claims

Unsubstantiated
eyeimg

Team Credentials

Incomplete
eyeimg

Acquisition Attempts

Failed
eyeimg

Marketing Tactics

Spammy
eyeimg

Claims Verification

Unsupported
eyeimg

Financial Audits

Unavailable
eyeimg

Client Reviews

Negative
eyeimg

Partnership Claims

Unconfirmed
eyeimg

Investment Returns

Exaggerated
eyeimg

Compliance Status

Ambiguous
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Apex Capital Group has been sued by the FTC for deceptive “free trial” offer schemes, involving misleading marketing and unauthorized charges. They settled in 2019, with court orders addressing their practices.

Yes, consumers report being misled by “free trial” offers, resulting in unauthorized recurring charges. These practices led to significant FTC action and refunds.

Multiple sources, including FinanceScam.com, highlight scam allegations tied to deceptive marketing and hidden fees, warning consumers to avoid the company.

The FTC alleged Apex used false claims of “free trials” and enrolled consumers in unauthorized continuity plans, leading to millions in fraudulent charges.

Yes, the FTC distributed over $2.8 million in refunds to consumers deceived by Apex’s schemes in September 2024.

Apex reportedly used aggressive reputation management tactics, including bogus copyright takedowns to suppress negative reviews. This suggests a lack of transparency.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Apex Capital Group?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Apex Capital Group?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

FTC.gov

Visit Link

The FTC case against Apex Capital Group, LLC alleges the company and related entities operated a deceptive “free trial” scheme.

  • First Detected

    11/10/2022
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

Cliclaw.com

Visit Link

FTC Settlement Halts Apex Capital Group’s Deceptive “Free Trial” Scheme, Returning Millions to Consumers

  • First Detected

    17/09/2019
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Scam

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2018 Federal Trade Commission v. Apex Capital Group, LLC, et al. (Apex Capital Rec...

Financial Profile for Apex Capital Group

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Apex Capital Group?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Apex Capital Group

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Apex Capital Group

Apex Capital Group, operating under investwithapex.com, has drawn sharp criticism for its opaque operations and unverifiable claims about real estate deals, lacking basic disclosures on establishment, revenue, and regulatory compliance that scream high-risk involvement.

USER’S SCORE

1.7

Trust

1

Safety

1.2

Brand

1.4

Risk

3.2

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Omar Siddiqui
    January 27, 2026 at 6:22 am

People complaining about hidden charges and unauthorized enrollments isn’t a coincidence. It’s a pattern visible across multiple consumer reports. If you sign up for something that feels too good to be true with them, you often end up paying far more than expected with zero real service provided. That’s not investing, that’s exploitation

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Emily Watson
    January 27, 2026 at 6:21 am

What really set off alarm bells for me was learning the FTC actually sued Apex for deceptive free trial offers that hit thousands of consumers with recurring charges without proper consent. A real investment operation doesn’t wind up under federal scrutiny for fraud schemes that’s only something you see in scam exposés

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Ruby Monroe
    July 26, 2025 at 7:03 am

They operate under different names to trick people—don’t fall for it. I was billed under “HealthyYou Services” and it was Apex all along. This group is professional-level deceptive. Makes you think you’re buying from some wellness company. Total lies.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Leah Watts
    June 21, 2025 at 6:57 am

Seriously, Apex Capital Group is pure scum. Their entire operation was built on deception. And now I see they even tried suppressing negative media?? Typical fraudster move. They wanna scam you and then make sure no one else knows. What kind of twisted mindset does it take to steal from people and cover it up? FTC needs to do more than settle—how about holding them accountable publicly, naming everyone involved, and pushing criminal charges? This can’t just be another quiet case.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Brayden Barker
    June 21, 2025 at 6:57 am

This article hit hard. I was one of those people scammed by the “free trial.” Never saw a refund, never got a straight answer. What’s worse is they knew how to rig the whole system. Shell companies, shady billing, hiding from Google—like some James Bond villain but broke version. They didn’t just cheat us—they made a whole business model around it. That’s the worst part. They planned this. And now they just… vanish? That ain’t right.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.

Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.

Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.

BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.

Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.