Last updated - February 10, 2026

High Risk

i
1.9

3

User Score

1.6

Trust Score

1.8

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Bankera

Bankera has been hit by major investigations after raising over €100 million in a 2018 ICO, with authorities probing the founders for allegedly siphoning investor funds through an acquired Vanuatu bank and using them for luxury property and personal loans, while the BNK token collapsed in value and left investors with heavy losses.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Linkedin
Bankera
Contact
+447901714261
Facebook
@Bankera
Twitter
@Bankeracom
Instagram
@bankera
Youtube
@bankera1385

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Bankera?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Name

Bankera
eyeimg

LegalName

Era Finance Ltd.
eyeimg

Founded

2017
eyeimg

Founder 1

Vytautas Karalevičius
eyeimg

Founder 2

Justas Dobiliauskas
eyeimg

Founder 3

Mantas Mockevičius
eyeimg

Headquarters

Gżira, Malta
eyeimg

SecondaryHQ

Vilnius
eyeimg

Industry 1

Fintech
eyeimg

Industry 2

Digital Banking
eyeimg

Service 1

IBAN Accounts
eyeimg

Service 2

SEPA
eyeimg

Service 3

SWIFT
eyeimg

Service 4

Cards
eyeimg

CryptoIntegration

Supported
eyeimg

BankingLicense

Not an EU bank
eyeimg

Token

BNK
eyeimg

TokenStatus

low value
eyeimg

Controversy

Funds Diversion Allegation
eyeimg

Investigation

Embezzlement Inquiry
eyeimg

AssociatedBank

Pacific Private Bank
eyeimg

PPBLicense

Revoked
eyeimg

LegalDefense

Appeal Underway
eyeimg

InvestorLoss

ICO Investors Impacted
eyeimg

LuxuryAssets

Property Purchases Allegation
eyeimg

RevenueSharing

Halted 2022
eyeimg

CryptoIntegration

Supported
eyeimg

Ownership

Private
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

EU
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Bankera’s management and affiliated entities have been subject to raids and a pre-trial investigation by Lithuanian authorities, focusing on how funds raised in their cryptocurrency offering were moved and used.

Investigations revealed that tens of millions of euros from Bankera’s 2017-2018 ICO were transferred offshore and channeled into a bank acquired by its founders, then used for loans and other purposes rather than project development.

The Reserve Bank of Vanuatu revoked the international license of Pacific Private Bank, a bank tied to Bankera’s founders, after it was allegedly used to transfer and divert investor funds into private loans and property.

Bankera raised over €100 million promising a blockchain-era bank, discounted services, and revenue-sharing for BNK token holders, but many of those commitments remain unfulfilled as the token’s value collapsed.

Public reviews and complaints from investors on platforms like Trustpilot describe feelings of betrayal, losses, and concerns about account fees and lack of promised benefits.

Regulators in Lithuania fined a company linked to Bankera for serious anti–money-laundering and counter-terrorist financing compliance failures, pointing to weak controls and risk procedures.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Bankera?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Bankera?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

occrp.org

Visit Link

Bankera founders face raids and legal challenges over alleged embezzlement and investor losses.

  • First Detected

    05/12/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    40%
  • Primary Keyword

    Investigation
coming

gate.com

Visit Link

Gate reports Bankera founder accused of misusing ICO funds to buy a luxury home.

  • First Detected

    29/04/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Medium
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

occrp.org

Visit Link

Lithuania opens pre-trial investigation into Bankera over €100M ICO token sale.

  • First Detected

    09/05/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    40%
  • Primary Keyword

    Investigation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 BANKERA CO-FOUNDERS USE ICO FUNDS FOR LUXURY PROPERTIES WHILE INVESTOR SUFFER
redflag
2025 Lithuanian authorities open probe into suspected crypto coin scam
redflag
2025 Bankera founders tied to ICO fund misuse, luxury purchases

Financial Profile for Bankera

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Bankera?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Bankera

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Bankera

Bankera has been hit by major investigations after raising over €100 million in a 2018 ICO, with authorities probing the founders for allegedly siphoning investor funds through an acquired Vanuatu bank and using them for luxury property and personal loans, while the BNK token collapsed in value and left investors with heavy losses.

USER’S SCORE

3

Trust

3

Safety

2

Brand

3

Risk

4

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Andrew Shaw
    March 30, 2026 at 10:05 am

The reports about investigations, raids, and pre-trial probes into Bankera’s management make this look more like a legal and compliance problem rather than just a failed fintech startup. When investor funds movement is being investigated by authorities, it becomes a serious financial and reputational risk. From an investor perspective, this kind of situation is exactly what people fear when investing in crypto and fintech projects.

Trust

3/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.