Black Harbor Wealth Management

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Published - December 17, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.4

2.1

User Score

2.6

Trust Score

2.5

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Black Harbor Wealth Management

Black Harbor Wealth Management became effectively inactive in the early 2020s following major scandals and lawsuits peaking in 2018-2019.The firm faced asset seizures from founder Chris Dixon in 2019 and multiple civil lawsuits over links to the Future Income Payments (FIP) collapse in 2018.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact No
+(864) 882-9859
Contact No
+(864) 396-5758

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Black Harbor Wealth Management?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Company Name

Black Harbor Wealth Management
eyeimg

Legal Entity

Black Harbor Wealth Management LLC
eyeimg

Location

Seneca
eyeimg

Secondary Location

Greenville
eyeimg

State

South Carolina
eyeimg

Country

USA
eyeimg

Address

325 Main St.
eyeimg

City

Seneca
eyeimg

Postal Code

29678
eyeimg

Principal

Connie Dixon
eyeimg

Partner

Chris Dixon
eyeimg

Employees

6
eyeimg

Revenue

$179,656
eyeimg

Industry

Financial Services
eyeimg

Category

Wealth Management
eyeimg

Specialization

Retirement Planning
eyeimg

Featured In

Forbes, Money, Fortune
eyeimg

Award Finalist

RA Magazine Top 5
eyeimg

Associated Advisor

Matthew Dixon
eyeimg

Previous Firm

Yes
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

United States
eyeimg

Sector

Investment Advisory
eyeimg

Client Focus

Retirement
eyeimg

Website Status

Inactive
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Black Harbor Wealth Management is named as a defendant in a South Carolina lawsuit alleging misleading financial advice involving a Symetra Indexed Universal Life policy that cost a couple significant retirement savings.

The complaint alleges Black Harbor’s culture fostered aggressive sales tactics and failed to uphold standards of care when promoting complex insurance strategies.

Previous reports indicate Black Harbor was involved in multiple lawsuits related to the promotion of IUL retirement planning strategies tied to structured cash‑flow schemes.

Plaintiffs allege Black Harbor lacked adequate compliance mechanisms, allowing misleading materials and unsuitable products to be sold to clients.

The firm has been depicted as part of a network that promoted high‑commission and complex retirement products, raising questions about conflicted incentives.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Black Harbor Wealth Management?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Black Harbor Wealth Management?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Website Name (e.g. OCCRP.org)

Visit Link

Matthew Dixon is a registered investment adviser with Resolute Capital, with a record showing a settled customer dispute over IUL advice.

  • First Detected

    08/07/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Neutral
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Document
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint
coming

coregroupusa.com

Visit Link

Matthew Dixon is sued by a South Carolina couple alleging his IUL retirement plan advice using a Symetra policy caused them major financial losses.

  • First Detected

    13/06/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Lawsuit
coming

insurancenewsnet.com

Visit Link

Matthew Dixon is sued by a South Carolina couple claiming his IUL retirement strategy with Symetra cost them substantial savings and used unrealistic

  • First Detected

    13/06/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Lawsuit

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Black Harbor Wealth Management: Matthew Dixon DMCA Takedown & Reputation Inve...
redflag
2025 Black Harbor Wealth Management: Matthew Dixon’s Symetra IUL Controversy and A...

Financial Profile for Black Harbor Wealth Management

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Black Harbor Wealth Management?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Black Harbor Wealth Management

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Black Harbor Wealth Management

Black Harbor Wealth Management became effectively inactive in the early 2020s following major scandals and lawsuits peaking in 2018-2019.The firm faced asset seizures from founder Chris Dixon in 2019 and multiple civil lawsuits over links to the Future Income Payments (FIP) collapse in 2018.

USER’S SCORE

2.1

Trust

1.8

Safety

2.3

Brand

2

Risk

2.5

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Brooke Simmons
    January 27, 2026 at 11:40 am

A 2020 fraud alert by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority identified a suspected fraudulent website using the Black Banx name that solicited deposits without authorization, cautioning the public to verify any institution making such offers.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Sofia Rossi
    January 1, 2026 at 11:47 am

Heard a few things online that made me hesitant.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • David Lindberg
    January 1, 2026 at 11:43 am

Feels sus — not putting my money there.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Anna Ferrari
    January 1, 2026 at 11:41 am

My experience started off friendly, but as we got into the specifics of my financial goals, I realized I had more questions than answers. Some recommendations didn’t feel fully explained, and I wasn’t always confident that I understood the risks involved. Communication felt a little slow at times, which made me nervous about trusting them with larger investments. I value honesty and transparency from someone handling my money, and I felt that was missing. I ended up exploring other options to feel more secure.

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.