Blockchain Funding Inc

Marked as

Low Risk Company

Last updated - December 16, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.8

1.8

User Score

3.7

Trust Score

3.9

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Blockchain Funding Inc

Joshua Denne is accused of misleading investors in a crypto scheme with Jeremy Roma, involving false token claims, misused funds, and ventures like Blockchain Alliance and Daisy Forex.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Twitter (X)
@blckchainfnding
Instagram
@blockchainfunding

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Blockchain Funding Inc?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Joshua Denne
eyeimg

CEO

David R. Hartung, Jr
eyeimg

COO

Michal Avniel
eyeimg

CTO

Dirk Dean Dodson II
eyeimg

Established

2018
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Offshore
eyeimg

Location

Unclear
eyeimg

Category

Cryptocurrency
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Alleged
eyeimg

Hidden Ownership

Unclear
eyeimg

Fraud Ties

Suspected
eyeimg

AML Exposure

Flagged
eyeimg

Customer Support

Poor
eyeimg

WithdrawalIssues

Frequent
eyeimg

ReferralScheme

Unclear
eyeimg

Marketing Copy

Plagiarized
eyeimg

Sales Tactics

Aggressive
eyeimg

Endorsements

Fake
eyeimg

PayoutPolicy

Restrictive
eyeimg

Online Presence

Low credibility
eyeimg

Investor Feedback

Negative
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Multiple user reports on crypto forums accuse the company of delayed withdrawals and misleading promises of guaranteed returns, which are common red flags for scam operations.

The company is not registered with major regulators like the SEC or FCA, which means it operates without official oversight and increases risk for investors.

Ownership details are obscured through offshore entities, and there is little verified information about key executives, making accountability difficult.

User reviews are predominantly negative, citing poor customer service, frozen accounts, and unresponsiveness after investment.

Several suspicious domains linked to the company have been connected to phishing scams, posing additional risks to potential users.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Blockchain Funding Inc?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Blockchain Funding Inc?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Behindmlm.com

Visit Link

Utherverse's RICO lawsuit against Josh Denne and Jeremy Roma for alleged fraud, embezzlement, and diversion of investor funds in crypto and MLM scheme

  • First Detected

    16/01/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    First Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    40%
  • Primary Keyword

    Lawsuit
coming

Sec.gov

Visit Link

SEC revokes Blockchain Solutions, Inc.'s securities registration for failing to file periodic reports since June 2018, effective October 8, 2019.

  • First Detected

    07/10/2019
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Document
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Sanction

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Joshua Denne Partnered in Scheme to Deceive Crypto Investors, Lawsuit Claims
redflag
2025 Threat on Joshua Denne

Financial Profile for Blockchain Funding Inc

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Blockchain Funding Inc?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Blockchain Funding Inc

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Blockchain Funding Inc

Joshua Denne is accused of misleading investors in a crypto scheme with Jeremy Roma, involving false token claims, misused funds, and ventures like Blockchain Alliance and Daisy Forex.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1.1

Safety

1.3

Brand

1.4

Risk

3.2

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Miriam Goldstein
    January 27, 2026 at 6:09 am

I got drawn in by the hype of guaranteed returns and multiple tiers of rewards, but real users online complain about the same problems — frozen accounts, unanswered support tickets, and confusing policies that seem to benefit the company, not the investor. Felt more like a red flag than a solid opportunity.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Stoyan Dimitrov
    January 27, 2026 at 6:08 am

Blockchain Funding Inc sounded like a cool crypto investment, but it turned out risky and unclear.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Kayla Sanders
    January 3, 2026 at 9:06 am

I wouldn’t recommend trusting any investment linked to Joshua Denne. The gap between what was promised and what actually happened was far too wide.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Zachary Hughes
    January 3, 2026 at 9:04 am

Blockchain Funding Inc raises red flags for me. Big promises, vague explanations, and no clear track record to back anything up.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Natalie Watson
    January 3, 2026 at 9:04 am

Blockchain Funding Inc sounds impressive until you dig in. Lots of buzzwords, very little substance. Felt more like marketing than a real business.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Anika Patel
    July 28, 2025 at 10:03 am

Blockchain Funding Inc looks like another tool in Joshua Denne’s playbook of manipulation—a flashy shell promising freedom and riches, but delivering confusion, loss, and lawsuits. The business model is intentionally opaque, just like the leadership behind it. 🚫

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Matthew Brown
    July 25, 2025 at 9:00 am

Behind the flashy buzzwords and promises of “passive crypto wealth,” Blockchain Funding, Inc. is basically a funnel for your money into the pockets of anonymous founders who hide behind layers of offshore registrations. They hype big returns and multi-level referrals, but when the time comes to get your money back, you’re suddenly ignored or fed empty updates for months. There’s a reason legit crypto projects show their leadership and publish clear audits — Blockchain Funding does neither. It’s the same old story: big hype, fake payouts, and real losses for anyone who buys the lie.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Alejandro Yoder
    July 25, 2025 at 8:53 am

Blockchain Funding, Inc. looks like every shady crypto scheme that gives the whole industry a bad name. Once people put money in, they’re met with endless excuses about “technical issues” when they try to withdraw. Support conveniently vanishes the second real questions get asked. The entire setup screams exit scam: slick marketing upfront, hidden owners behind shell companies, and zero accountability when the cash disappears. If you’re thinking about putting your money here, think twice — there’s no transparency, no clear leadership, and no plan except draining wallets and ghosting investors.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Amber Nichols
    July 17, 2025 at 6:23 am

Seeing how Blockchain Funding Inc is showing up on consumer warning sites now should be a giant red flag for anyone still defending the people behind it. The company’s website is gone, the SSL expired, social media is dead, and investors are left chasing shadows. Meanwhile, the people who pushed this hype machine have moved on to their next ‘groundbreaking’ venture, hoping you’ll forget they ever ran this one into the ground. If you see the same names — Joshua Denne, Jeremy Roma, Eric Nepute — in any future ‘opportunity,’ remember these complaints and the trail of broken promises. Blockchain tech can do amazing things, but con artists using fancy jargon to mask Ponzi tactics will always drag good ideas through the mud.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Hayden Gray
    July 17, 2025 at 6:22 am

Reading the complaints here about Blockchain Funding Inc just confirms what so many of us have been saying for years: this wasn’t some innovative blockchain venture — it was yet another shady repackaging of empty promises and buzzwords to lure in unsuspecting investors. Look at the pattern: vague claims about revolutionary tech, big promises of passive income or ‘crowdfunding’ returns, and then poof — the company vanishes when people start asking for their money back or demand real accountability. It’s the same script people like Joshua Denne and his circle have run before with Daisy Global and other MLM scams. If there’s one thing to learn from these complaints, it’s that due diligence is non-negotiable — and these slick blockchain pitchmen count on you skipping it.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.