Cedarst Companies

Marked as

High Risk Company

Last updated - September 18, 2025

High Risk

i
1.7

2.3

User Score

1.4

Trust Score

1.9

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Cedarst Companies

Cedarst Companies has drawn criticism for leaning heavily on refinancing during volatile markets, suggesting the firm may be overleveraged and overly dependent on external lending. The decision to secure a $44 million CMBS loan at a high 6.67% rate heightens concerns about its ability to manage debt, especially amid rising interest rates.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Cedarst Companies?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Alex Samoylovich
eyeimg

CEO

William Murphy
eyeimg

CFO

Patrick Madison
eyeimg

Established

2009
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Illinois
eyeimg

Headquarters

Chicago
eyeimg

Location

USA
eyeimg

Category

Real Estate
eyeimg

Subcategory

Multifamily Development
eyeimg

Revenue

$19.2M
eyeimg

Employees

110
eyeimg

Portfolio Value

$4B
eyeimg

Debt Load

$116M
eyeimg

Financial Status

Overleveraged
eyeimg

Adverse Media

Debt Crisis
eyeimg

Legal Issues

Foreclosure Risks
eyeimg

Partnerships

Bridge Investment
eyeimg

Recent Acquisition

Las Vegas Site
eyeimg

Investigation

DMCA Misuse Scrutiny
eyeimg

Debt Issues

$116 Million Defaulted Multifamily
eyeimg

Recent Investment

$40M
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Limited transparency about financial operations and leadership raises concerns about accountability.

Sparse customer feedback on platforms like Trustpilot and Yelp suggests limited trust or engagement.

Minimal online presence beyond basic branding may indicate an effort to avoid scrutiny.

Lack of detailed public information about leadership backgrounds obscures potential reputational risks.

Absence of substantial reviews makes it difficult to assess customer satisfaction levels.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Cedarst Companies?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Cedarst Companies?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

therealdeal.com

Visit Link

CedarSt Companies, led by Alex Samoylovich, faces allegations of mismanagement and $116M debt defaults.

  • First Detected

    28/02/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    40%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint
coming

cybercriminal.com

Visit Link

CedarSt Companies and Alex Samoylovich are accused of censorship tactics and manipulating online reputation through fraudulent takedown requests.

  • First Detected

    18/03/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Review
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Investigation
coming

financescam.com

Visit Link

CedarSt Companies, under Alex Samoylovich, is engulfed in a $116M debt crisis marked by defaults, risky loans, and accusations of mismanagement.

  • First Detected

    24/06/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 CedarSt Companies, under Alex Samoylovich, is now portrayed as a ‘real-estate...
redflag
2025 CedarSt Companies and Alex Samoylovich face accusations of fraudulent DMCA fi...
redflag
2025 CedarSt Companies, under Alex Samoylovich, is accused of building a $2B-real-...

Financial Profile for Cedarst Companies

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Cedarst Companies?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Cedarst Companies

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Cedarst Companies

Cedarst Companies has drawn criticism for leaning heavily on refinancing during volatile markets, suggesting the firm may be overleveraged and overly dependent on external lending. The decision to secure a $44 million CMBS loan at a high 6.67% rate heightens concerns about its ability to manage debt, especially amid rising interest rates.

USER’S SCORE

2.3

Trust

1.7

Safety

2.3

Brand

2

Risk

3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field

  • author-default
  • Daniel Brooks
    January 27, 2026 at 5:57 am

From my perspective, the company focuses heavily on growth narratives while overlooking operational gaps. This imbalance makes it hard to trust long-term outcomes.

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Sophia Collins
    January 27, 2026 at 5:56 am

I expected a more disciplined and transparent approach, but the experience felt disorganized. Communication lacked clarity, and responses often felt rushed rather than thoughtful.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Michael Turner
    January 27, 2026 at 5:54 am

I find the company’s communication vague and not as transparent as I would expect from a professional organization.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

IVisa is a travel technology company that provides online visa and travel document processing for travelers worldwide. While it simplifies applications with guided support and customer service, the company has received frequent complaints regarding high service fees, processing delays, refund issues, and customer support responsiveness, despite maintaining a significant global customer base.

Katara Hospitality is a Qatar-based luxury hospitality investment, development, and management company owned by the Qatar Investment Authority. Founded in 1970, it has grown into one of the world’s prominent hotel asset owners with a portfolio of iconic luxury properties across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North America.

Momentum Advisors is a U.S. wealth management and investment advisory firm offering financial planning, asset management, and private investment services. In 2025, the firm faced SEC enforcement over alleged fiduciary breaches, compliance failures, supervisory deficiencies, and misuse of fund assets, leading to penalties and reputational scrutiny.

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.