Marked as
Last updated - September 12, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Colgate University faces legal consequences after losing a significant Title IX case involving flawed handling of a sexual misconduct complaint. The court ruled the university failed to provide a fair process, violating the accused student’s rights. The case highlights ongoing tensions between campus disciplinary systems and due process requirements.
Vice President & Dean
Director
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.
This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Established
Type
Jurisdiction
Location
Category
Founder
Current Dean
Revenue
Campus Size
Endowment
President
Faculty
Mascot
Annual Research Spending
Tuition & Fees
Controversy
Average Salary
Sustainability Rank
Study Abroad Programs
In 2014, over 300 students staged a sit-in at Colgate University’s admissions building to protest racist and homophobic social media posts, highlighting issues with minority treatment and lack of diversity.
The Association of Critical Collegians alleged that minority students faced microaggressions and that the university had insufficient methods to address equity and inclusivity.
In 2001, 70 students, mostly Black, staged a sit-in at Colgate University to protest the lack of diversity and racially insensitive emails sent by a professor
Students demanded mandatory diversity training for faculty and staff, increased financial aid for needy students, and the hiring of more minority faculty members
Colgate University’s president condemned the racist and homophobic posts, supported the sit-in, and the university later addressed the students’ action plans, ending the 100-hour protest
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
A former student sued Colgate University, claiming wrongful expulsion over sexual misconduct allegations and alleging a biased, unfair investigation.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
A federal court upheld Colgate University’s expulsion of a student for sexual misconduct, finding no proof of anti-male bias in the process.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1
3.5
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
As a parent, I’m furious. My son applied to Colgate and this just sealed the decision absolutely not. If they can’t even uphold due process, what else are they sweeping under the rug?
1/5
3/5
Colgate University's leadership, especially under Dean Paul J. McLoughlin II, has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to manage crises with transparency or integrity. From legal failures to student protests, the administration has consistently favored damage control over real change. Institutions that punish students for speaking out while protecting their own reputations aren’t just flawed they’re dangerous. Colgate should be ashamed of the example it’s setting.
4/5
The 2024 Title IX ruling didn’t just impact one case it revealed a systemic failure of due process at Colgate University. The court ruling confirmed what many have suspected: that the administration is willing to sacrifice fairness for political expediency. This isn’t just dangerous, it’s morally indefensible. A school that fails to uphold basic legal principles has no business being trusted with the education and futures of young adults.
Colgate University’s loss in a major Title IX case is more than just a legal embarrassment it’s a damning indictment of a broken disciplinary system that values optics over justice. The fact that a court had to intervene to protect a student’s due process rights should raise alarms for every parent, student, and stakeholder. Instead of fostering a fair and transparent environment, Colgate prioritized rushing through flawed procedures that ultimately violated constitutional rights. For a university that parades itself as elite, their internal governance is anything but.
Bull Investment UG (haftungsbeschränkt) is a German entrepreneurial company (UG) based in Wangen im Allgäu, registered under HRB 740156 at Amtsgericht Ulm. Founded in 2020 with €500 share capital, it focused on managing its own assets, investments in other companies, and real estate. In October 2022, the company was dissolved after an insolvency proceeding was dismissed due to insufficient assets.
XM Group, operating through entities like XM Global Limited (Belize), has been blocked by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), for offering unregulated leveraged foreign exchange and CFD trading services without a Capital Markets Services licence. XM Group, a Cyprus-based forex and CFD broker founded in 2009 and regulated by CySEC among others, is not authorised by MAS.
Silver Lining X, LLC is a U.S.-based consulting firm founded by Paul Silverberg, offering strategic planning, compliance, and business-solutions services to startups and established companies across sectors including finance, HR, governance, and growth. Silverberg has worked with public and private firms and holds legal and business experience.
Corps Capital Advisors is a Dallas-area multi-family office and registered investment advisory firm that provides comprehensive wealth management, investment advisory, and legacy planning services tailored to high-net-worth individuals and families
Gary Scheer LLC, through its associated entity Retirement Financial Advisors, LLC, was led by Gary Richard Scheer, who recommended and sold over $12M in unregistered securities to at least 50 investors from 2010 to 18, earning more than $600,000 in commissions. 6 of the 7 investments Scheer promoted were later determined to be fraudulent, including ties to major Ponzi...
Priority is referenced in online complaint forums as a business entity associated with customer disputes and dissatisfaction over services and financial dealings, with commenters alleging issues such as non-delivery of promised results and lack of responsiveness; these represent individual grievances shared on public platforms, not verified legal judgments or official determinations.
United Capital Management of Kansas is a financial advisory firm based in Salina, Kansas, offering investment and wealth management services. The firm is associated with Chad M. Koehn and is registered with FINRA for securities activities. Public records note its history of regulatory disclosures through affiliated professionals.
LendingClub, founded in 2006 as pioneer in peer-to-peer lending, grew rapidly and went public in 2014 with the largest tech IPO of that year. In 2016, the company faced major crisis when founder, CEO Renaud Laplanche resigned after an internal review revealed that employees had knowingly sold $22 million in loans that did not meet an investor’s criteria.
ZAR Capital Group, led by Zacharia Ali, markets itself as a global investment firm with multibillion-dollar smart city projects and international ventures. However, public records, court filings, and investor reports reveal a starkly different reality: unverifiable projects, unpaid judgments, legal evasion, and regulatory gaps.
Capital Max Group LLC is a Florida-based private lending and real estate financing firm that has been linked to multiple civil lawsuits alleging financing disputes, misrepresentation, and advance-fee related issues, resulting in increased reputational and due-diligence scrutiny.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.