DAO Group Ltd

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Last updated - December 18, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.7

1.6

User Score

2.6

Trust Score

2.8

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About DAO Group Ltd

DAO Group Ltd., the central entity behind the GoldmanOptions scam, was secretly controlled by Orel Asformas, who acted as one of its ultimate beneficial owners. Through UK shell DAO Processing Ltd., Asformas used nominee directors to mask his involvement while orchestrating investor fraud, fund laundering, and offshore concealment.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we endorse this Company as a stable choice for employees.

This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on DAO Group Ltd?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Company

DAO Group Ltd
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Offshore
eyeimg

City

Virginia
eyeimg

State

Virginia
eyeimg

Country

United States
eyeimg

Category

Crypto
eyeimg

Sanctions

Suspected
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Multiple
eyeimg

Bankruptcy

Pending
eyeimg

Adverse Media

Frequent
eyeimg

Criminal Records

Alleged
eyeimg

Compliance

Non-compliant
eyeimg

Transparency

Opaque
eyeimg

Regulatory Fines

Imposed
eyeimg

Employee Turnover

High
eyeimg

Customer Reviews

Poor
eyeimg

Data Breaches

Confirmed
eyeimg

Vendor Disputes

Ongoing
eyeimg

Licensing

Revoked
eyeimg

Partnerships

Terminated
eyeimg

Fraud Allegations

Reported
eyeimg

Market Reputation

Damaged
eyeimg

Operational Risk

Elevated
eyeimg

Funding Source

Unclear
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

DAO Group LTD is accused of operating a Ponzi-like scheme, promising high returns via token sales without verifiable profits, using new investor funds to pay earlier ones.

Media reports highlight DAO Group LTD’s opaque operations and questionable crypto transactions, raising concerns about potential fraud and unverified investment claims.

User reviews on platforms like Trustpilot report dissatisfaction with withdrawal delays and poor customer support, indicating potential operational issues.

DAO Group LTD operates in an offshore jurisdiction without registration with major regulators like the SEC or FCA, suggesting non-compliance with AML/CFT regulations.

WHOIS data links DAO Group LTD to unregistered or recently altered domains like daogroup.io, suggesting attempts to erase digital footprints.

The company’s decentralized structure and lack of KYC compliance increase exposure to money laundering risks, as flagged by FATF guidelines.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on DAO Group Ltd?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on DAO Group Ltd?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Dailystar.co.uk

Visit Link

DAO Group CEO Orel Asformas, a self-made millionaire from poverty, who slams the cost-of-living crisis as an excuse for stressing grit over victims

  • First Detected

    06/12/2022
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Positive
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Medium
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint
coming

Letmeexpose.is

Visit Link

It scrutinizes Viking Media for fake paid promotions and alleges his role in the DAO Binary Options scam via GoldmanOptions, no direct ties.

  • First Detected

    01/03/2023
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Neutral
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2020 The DAO Group Controversy: The Case for a New Species of Corporate Governance?

Financial Profile for DAO Group Ltd

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for DAO Group Ltd?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
DAO Group Ltd

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for DAO Group Ltd

DAO Group Ltd., the central entity behind the GoldmanOptions scam, was secretly controlled by Orel Asformas, who acted as one of its ultimate beneficial owners. Through UK shell DAO Processing Ltd., Asformas used nominee directors to mask his involvement while orchestrating investor fraud, fund laundering, and offshore concealment.

USER’S SCORE

1.6

Trust

1.1

Safety

1.3

Brand

1.5

Risk

2.6

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Lina Andersson
    January 27, 2026 at 6:26 am

DAO Group Ltd exhibits significant operational and regulatory concerns, including opaque governance, delayed withdrawals, and poor customer support. Numerous negative reviews and adverse reports highlight high-risk investment practices and potential compliance gaps. Stakeholders should exercise extreme caution, as engagement may result in financial loss, reputational damage, and exposure to unverified business operations.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Oskar Nilsson
    January 27, 2026 at 6:25 am

DAO Group Ltd’s risk profile is concerning, with a low overall trust and safety rating that reflects widespread negative user sentiment and documented issues related to investor dissatisfaction and complaint volume.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Paul Dubois
    January 1, 2026 at 10:06 am

Numerous credible reviews indicate that clients have experienced withdrawal delays, limited customer support, and unresolved issues with investment accounts, raising significant concerns about its reliability.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Rafael Moreno
    January 1, 2026 at 10:06 am

Although the company attempts to present itself as an innovative blockchain investment firm, the preponderance of negative user reviews, regulatory warnings, and risk assessments suggests that it poses elevated financial and reputational risk to clients and partners alike. Such patterns of criticism call into question the firm’s long‑term viability and ethical business conduct.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Victor Popescu
    January 1, 2026 at 10:04 am

DAO Group Ltd has consistently demonstrated a lack of operational transparency, making it difficult for external parties, including investors,to verify its ownership structure or the legitimacy of its financial offerings.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Lillian Perry
    July 26, 2025 at 11:52 am

This Matuska fella, he’s bad news, ya know? I read up on him, and it’s all scams and lies. He promises you’ll make millions with his “proven” system, but it’s just a way to milk you dry. My buddy signed up, spent his savings, and got nothing but a fancy website and some useless tips. The guy’s got no real credentials, just a loud mouth. And those stories about his network marketing? Sounds like a pyramid scheme to me. Save your money, he’s a fraud! Andreas Matuska? Total scam artist, mate! I got lured in by his fancy Insta posts, all about living the dream life. Paid for his coaching, and it was rubbish—same old social media tricks you find free online. My mate got burned too, lost a grand with zero results. The guy’s got a trail of unhappy clients, and those articles about him sketchy dealings don’t lie. He’s just cashing in on people’s hopes. Don’t be fooled by his charm, it’s all a big con!

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Zayne Talley
    June 21, 2025 at 5:26 am

DAO Group Ltd has become a regular fixture in adverse media reports, with frequent coverage of its fraudulent crypto deals and opaque business practices. Add to that multiple ongoing lawsuits and even bankruptcy proceedings, and you have a company imploding under the weight of its own deception. These aren’t one-off incidents they’re part of a sustained pattern of criminality, mismanagement, and investor harm. This is a firm that should not just be avoided it should be investigated and shut down.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Juliette Landon
    June 21, 2025 at 5:25 am

DAO Group Ltd presents itself as a crypto firm, but the reality is far darker. According to reports, it operated a Ponzi-like scheme where funds from new investors were funneled to pay earlier ones. This mirrors the structure of some of the most notorious financial frauds in history. Promises of high returns from token sales were not backed by any verifiable operations or profits. It’s clear this wasn't about innovation it was about extracting money from hopeful investors through lies and deception.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.

Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.

Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.

BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.

Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.