Last updated - September 15, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.6

1.8

User Score

3.8

Trust Score

3.7

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Doc.com

Doc.com is an innovative telemedicine platform revolutionizing access to healthcare by leveraging blockchain technology. The company offers free basic medical consultations through its app, making essential healthcare services more accessible, especially in underserved regions. By integrating artificial intelligence with medical expertise, Doc.com enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Linkedin
doccom1
Twitter
doc_comofficial
Instagram
doc.comofficial
Phone no
+18603687357

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Doc.com?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Company

Doc.com
eyeimg

Owner

Charles Nader
eyeimg

Established

2016
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Mexico
eyeimg

Location

Mexico City
eyeimg

Category

Telemedicine
eyeimg

Revenue

$10 Million
eyeimg

Associated Entity

Doc Health US
eyeimg

Industry Role

Healthcare Technology
eyeimg

Risk Rating

Critical
eyeimg

Sanctions

Implicated
eyeimg

Lawsuits

Pending
eyeimg

Criminal Records

Suspected
eyeimg

Advisor Claims

Fabricated
eyeimg

Data Security

Vulnerable
eyeimg

User Privacy

Exploited
eyeimg

Investor Luring

Baiting
eyeimg

Audit Plans

Vague
eyeimg

Regulatory Compliance

Evaded
eyeimg

Promoter Involvement

Toxic
eyeimg

App Reviews

Faked
eyeimg

Health Data Handling

Abusive
eyeimg

Business Focus

Profiteering
eyeimg

ICO Outcomes

Disastrous
eyeimg

Airdrop Promises

Broken
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Multiple users and forums have alleged that Doc.com is a scam, particularly criticizing its token sale and healthcare service promises.

Yes, users report that the MTC token became virtually worthless after launch and was difficult or impossible to cash out.

Critics argue that the company made exaggerated claims about using blockchain and AI for healthcare services without delivering a viable product.

Doc.com conducted an ICO in 2018 without clear regulatory oversight, raising concerns about investor protection and compliance.

Reviewers have complained that the app-based medical consultation service was either non-functional or provided generic, unhelpful advice.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Doc.com?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Doc.com?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Coindesk.com

Visit Link

Doc.com Token Sales Marred by Dubious Claims

  • First Detected

    13/09/2021
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

Coingeek.com

Visit Link

Doc.com Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Misleading Fundraising Tactics

  • First Detected

    30/01/2019
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation

Financial Profile for Doc.com

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Doc.com?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Doc.com

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Doc.com

Doc.com is an innovative telemedicine platform revolutionizing access to healthcare by leveraging blockchain technology. The company offers free basic medical consultations through its app, making essential healthcare services more accessible, especially in underserved regions. By integrating artificial intelligence with medical expertise, Doc.com enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1

Safety

1.6

Brand

1.4

Risk

3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Lena Schneider
    January 27, 2026 at 7:07 am

Doc.com has repeatedly demonstrated serious operational and service shortcomings that raise significant concerns for both users and potential partners. The company promotes itself as a blockchain-based healthcare platform, yet there is minimal transparency regarding regulatory compliance, leadership accountability, and actual delivery of promised services. Numerous users have reported app malfunctions, unresponsive customer support.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Patrick Doyle
    January 27, 2026 at 7:06 am

Customers have billing practices that result in unexpected charges and poor customer support, indicating systemic issues with transparency and user trust.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Emma Simmons
    July 28, 2025 at 5:30 am

It’s incredibly frustrating how Doc.com sold itself as a revolutionary telemedicine platform but delivered a broken app, missing features, and token rewards that never materialized. People genuinely needed accessible healthcare, and instead they got a crypto scheme hidden behind buzzwords. The platform’s functionality was unreliable, and support was virtually nonexistent. It feels like vulnerable users were used to drive token speculation, not receive actual care. That’s not just unethical it’s exploitation dressed as innovation.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Felix Greco
    June 21, 2025 at 3:48 pm

The investigative findings are articulated with precision and supported by sequential evidence. Key takeaways are promptly highlighted, facilitating executive read-through. Peer benchmarking data could further enhance the insight depth. Overall, this is a high-quality deliverable.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Alina Novak
    June 21, 2025 at 3:40 pm

The investigation narrative is well-organized, offering detailed evidence and clear conclusions. It balances technical depth with accessibility, catering to both specialists and executives. Risk indicators are clearly defined, and response recommendations align with industry best practices. However, a glossary for specialized terms would be beneficial.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.

Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.

Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.

BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.

Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.