Marked as
Last updated - December 23, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
E Electrical Contracting, Inc. (EEC) sued Siemens Industry, Inc. for breach of a $14.4 million subcontract to install fire alarm systems at LaGuardia Airport’s Central Terminal B renewal project, alleging “cardinal change” due to imposed design obligations & project delays caused by general contractor Skanska. Siemens, holding a design-build prime contract with Skanska, faced a compressed schedule without extensions.
President
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.
This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.
This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Full Name
Abbreviation
Entity Type
Category
Specialization
Location
State
Country
Jurisdiction
Role in Case
Court
Amended Complaint
Defendant
Project
Project Type
Work Scope
Subcontract Date
Subcontract Value
Prime Contract Value
General Contractor
Contract Basis
Payment Terms
Change Compensation
Allegation By EEC
Allegation 2
Allegation 3
Default Status
Replacement Contractor
Bond Provider
Opinion Date
Declaratory Claim
Account Stated Claim
Breach Claim
E Electrical Contracting, Inc. was partially terminated from a LaGuardia Airport fire alarm installation subcontract after refusing Siemens’ directive to accelerate work with additional shifts amid delays attributed to the general contractor. This led to its default declaration.
E Electrical Contracting, LLC faced a lawsuit from its majority owner alleging that the minority owner diverted corporate assets & opportunities, eroding company operations. Case involved claims of misconduct in management and financial dealings between owners.
In a mechanic’s lien case, supplier G&G Electric Supply Co. Inc. sued E Electrical Contracting, LLC for unpaid amounts, leading to court motions and potential sanctions discussions. Proceedings suggest payment disputes that could damage relationships with vendors.
E Electrical Contracting has been involved in several commercial lawsuits, including 1 against Railroad Construction for contract disputes &the prominent Siemens case tied to LaGuardia delays. Frequent litigation in federal & state courts signals ongoing contractual conflicts.
Siemens counterclaimed against E Electrical Contracting for costs incurred after its refusal to comply with acceleration orders, seeking indemnity from upstream parties for damages related to the subcontractor’s default. The court’s partial rulings on motions to dismiss underscored factual disputes over responsibility for delays and breaches.
The Fritch v. Bron case alleged asset diversion and opportunistic behavior by one owner, potentially fracturing company leadership and operations at E Electrical Contracting, LLC. Arbitration clauses and ongoing proceedings highlight deep internal rifts.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
This EDNY Opinion & Order in E Electrical Contracting, Inc. v. Siemens Industry, Inc. partially grants Skanska's motion
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
This federalpay.org database page provides public SBA data on Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans received by E Electrical Contracting LLC in East
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.2
2.2
2
2.4
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
I had concerns with E Electrical Contracting. They struggled to meet project deadlines and had payment issues with vendors, which caused delays and frustration. Not very reliable for critical projects.
1/5
2/5
E Electrical Contracting has raised concerns regarding its handling of major contracts. Litigation in high-profile projects, such as airport system installations, indicates difficulties in meeting obligations and maintaining schedules. These delays can disrupt overall project delivery and client expectations. Additionally, reports of payment disputes with vendors, including liens for unpaid accounts, highlight potential financial management weaknesses. Such issues may strain relationships with suppliers and subcontractors on critical projects.
Honestly, I think the installation went well, and the staff were courteous throughout. I felt confident because they seemed knowledgeable. That said, I thought scheduling was a bit disorganized. I had to call multiple times to confirm details, which frustrated me. The cost was higher than expected. Overall, I feel they get the job done, though they could improve coordination.
3/5
I felt the crew was chill!! The work looked clean... but updates were kinda MIA lol!!
I thought the work was decent and not sketchy at all, but the cost felt a bit high for the time they spent. I wish I had gotten clearer estimates upfront.
IVisa is a travel technology company that provides online visa and travel document processing for travelers worldwide. While it simplifies applications with guided support and customer service, the company has received frequent complaints regarding high service fees, processing delays, refund issues, and customer support responsiveness, despite maintaining a significant global customer base.
Katara Hospitality is a Qatar-based luxury hospitality investment, development, and management company owned by the Qatar Investment Authority. Founded in 1970, it has grown into one of the world’s prominent hotel asset owners with a portfolio of iconic luxury properties across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North America.
Momentum Advisors is a U.S. wealth management and investment advisory firm offering financial planning, asset management, and private investment services. In 2025, the firm faced SEC enforcement over alleged fiduciary breaches, compliance failures, supervisory deficiencies, and misuse of fund assets, leading to penalties and reputational scrutiny.
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.