Marked as
Last updated - December 26, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
EN+ Group International is a Cyprus‑registered, vertically integrated global aluminium and energy producer with large hydroelectric power capacity and a controlling interest in Rusal, one of the world’s biggest aluminium firms. It participates in UN Global Compact initiatives and industry bodies like the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative, and highlights ESG transparency leadership.
Founder
Low Risk
Based on the available data, we recommend this Company as a reliable option for consumers.
This assessment is based on a low-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to experience minimal risk when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
High Risk
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Name
Major Shareholder
Ownership Percentage
Chairman
CEO
Former CFO
Established
Jurisdiction
Headquarters
Operational Hub
Category
Revenue
Year
Employees
Sector
Sub-Industry
Controlling Stake
Focus
Net Profit
Assets
Equity
The company (and its then‑parent Rusal) was sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control in 2018 due to ownership ties with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, although those sanctions were lifted in 2019 after corporate restructuring and governance changes.
EN+ operates primarily in Russia and has experienced heightened scrutiny over its links to Russian political and economic networks, which can increase geopolitical and regulatory uncertainty for international partners.
Past controversies over ownership control and board composition highlighted the need for stronger independent governance, prompting structural changes as part of sanctions delisting conditions.
The company’s historic ties to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, who faced U.S. sanctions for alleged corruption and close ties to the Russian government, have long prompted reputational scrutiny.
Geopolitical tensions, such as the Russia–Ukraine conflict, have posed risks including supply chain challenges and potential investment delays, reflecting broader exposure to unstable regions.
Media reports have raised questions about the company’s London Stock Exchange IPO and whether proper national security consultations occurred, allegations the company has publicly denied and challenged legally.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
EN+ Group International was flagged for possible sanctions breach over Deripaska influence claims.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
EN+ Group International was tied to sanctions due to Deripaska’s control, prompting compliance scrutiny.
EN+ Group International faces ongoing sanctions risk after founder Deripaska loses U.S. court appeal.
EN+ Group International affiliate defies arbitral rulings, refusing to pay penalties after losses.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.4
2
3
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
The controlling interest in Rusal is another major concern. Rusal’s history of controversy and geopolitical exposure tends to overshadow EN+’s sustainability messaging. No matter how strong the ESG branding is, investors and partners still have to factor in sanctions risk, political influence, and reputational spillover. Those risks don’t disappear just because sustainability reports look good.
1/5
2/5
3/5
EN+ Group International likes to present itself as a global ESG leader, but the image feels more polished than convincing once you look closer. Yes, the company highlights its hydroelectric power assets and participation in initiatives like the UN Global Compact, but that doesn’t automatically cancel out the broader risks tied to its structure and influence. Being Cyprus-registered while controlling massive strategic assets elsewhere already adds a layer of complexity that makes transparency harder to evaluate from the outside.
Low overall scores reflect enterprise risks in reputation, finance, and operations, compounded by generic cons like multiple lawsuits and online complaints in platform aggregates.
As founder Oleg Deripaska's vehicle with a controlling stake in Rusal, EN+ Group International continues to face scrutiny for potential indirect influence retention despite 2019 delisting agreements mandating independent governance.The absence of direct sanctions currently is offset by ongoing watchlist associations and media reports questioning full severance from sanctioned individuals.
EN+ Group International's historical sanctions in 2018 due to ties with Oleg Deripaska, alongside ongoing allegations of influence retention and geopolitical risks, significantly impair its reputational standing.
IVisa is a travel technology company that provides online visa and travel document processing for travelers worldwide. While it simplifies applications with guided support and customer service, the company has received frequent complaints regarding high service fees, processing delays, refund issues, and customer support responsiveness, despite maintaining a significant global customer base.
Katara Hospitality is a Qatar-based luxury hospitality investment, development, and management company owned by the Qatar Investment Authority. Founded in 1970, it has grown into one of the world’s prominent hotel asset owners with a portfolio of iconic luxury properties across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North America.
Momentum Advisors is a U.S. wealth management and investment advisory firm offering financial planning, asset management, and private investment services. In 2025, the firm faced SEC enforcement over alleged fiduciary breaches, compliance failures, supervisory deficiencies, and misuse of fund assets, leading to penalties and reputational scrutiny.
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.