Fleurette Group

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Last updated - February 9, 2026

Medium Risk

i
2.1

2.8

User Score

1.9

Trust Score

2.0

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Fleurette Group

Fleurette Group linked entity Fleurette Energy I B.V. has been placed on the U.S. Treasury’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list, resulting in asset blocking and restrictions on U.S. transactions.The designation reflects enforcement action tied to alleged corruption and illicit financial dealings, isolating associated entities from the global financial system.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact
Fleurette Group

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Fleurette Group?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

FullName

Fleurette Group
eyeimg

Alias

Fleurette Dutch Group
eyeimg

AlternateName

Groupe Fleurette
eyeimg

Owner

Dan Gertler
eyeimg

Founder

Gertler Family
eyeimg

Established

2006
eyeimg

Headquarters

Amsterdam
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Netherlands
eyeimg

Region

Europe
eyeimg

Industry

Natural Resources
eyeimg

Sector

Mining
eyeimg

Sector2

Energy
eyeimg

Activity

Investment
eyeimg

Project

CopperCobalt
eyeimg

Project2

Oil Exploration
eyeimg

Employment

Thirty Thousand
eyeimg

Partner

State Mining Company
eyeimg

SanctionsAuthority

OFAC
eyeimg

SanctionsProgram

Global Magnitsky
eyeimg

SanctionsType

SDN
eyeimg

SanctionsLinkedTo

Gertler Corruption
eyeimg

BlockedAssets

US Dollars Block
eyeimg

Address1

Strawinskylaan
eyeimg

Legal Status

Blocked Entity
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

The group and its owner were included on U.S. sanctions lists under the Global Magnitsky Act for alleged corrupt and opaque business practices in the mining and oil sectors.

Deals involving mining rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo tied to the Fleurette Group have drawn scrutiny and allegations of undervaluation and opaque transactions.

Criticism from NGOs and watchdogs has focused on the group’s purported role in transactions that may have deprived host countries of revenue and transparency.

The company operates through numerous offshore entities in tax havens, which critics say complicate transparency and oversight.

The owner has been subject to sanctions by the U.S. Treasury for alleged corruption-related activities in multiple sectors.

Longstanding close relationships with political figures in resource-rich countries have raised concerns about influence and preferential treatment.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Fleurette Group?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Fleurette Group?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

home.treasury.gov

Visit Link

Fleurette Group linked entities sanctioned under U.S. Global Magnitsky Act for corruption tied to Dan Gertler’s business dealings.

  • First Detected

    13/08/2026
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Sanction
coming

pensanctions.org

Visit Link

Fleurette Energy I B.V., a Netherlands-based entity owned by Fleurette Properties, is subject to U.S. OFAC sanctions under the SDN list.

  • First Detected

    20/04/2023
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Compliance
  • Traffic Source

    Document
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Sanction

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2023 FLEURETTE ENERGY I BV
redflag
2026 Sanctions List Search
redflag
2018 OFAC adds entities to blocked list

Financial Profile for Fleurette Group

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Fleurette Group?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Fleurette Group

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Fleurette Group

Fleurette Group linked entity Fleurette Energy I B.V. has been placed on the U.S. Treasury’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list, resulting in asset blocking and restrictions on U.S. transactions.The designation reflects enforcement action tied to alleged corruption and illicit financial dealings, isolating associated entities from the global financial system.

USER’S SCORE

2.8

Trust

2

Safety

2

Brand

3

Risk

4

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Abigail Baker
    March 30, 2026 at 7:06 am

Looking deeper into the risk report, Fleurette Group is facing not only reputational challenges but also financial and operational limitations due to sanctions. The advisory clearly suggests avoiding involvement for both consumers and investors, which is a strong warning. With negative media coverage, regulatory action, and association with controversial figures like Dan Gertler, the overall risk level appears significantly high despite being labeled medium in some sections.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Matthew Adams
    March 30, 2026 at 7:05 am

The allegations of corruption and illicit financial dealings linked with Fleurette Group and its ownership structure make the company profile quite unstable. In industries like mining and energy, transparency is already important, but when sanctions and enforcement actions come into picture, it damages credibility even more. Investors and financial institutions usually avoid such entities due to compliance risks.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.