Marked as
Last updated - January 28, 2026
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
The Gaurav Sharon Srivastava Family Foundation portrays itself as a philanthropic organization dedicated to noble causes, but investigations suggest a far more troubling reality. Lacking any verified charitable status, the foundation appears to operate as a fraudulent corporate front, raising concerns about its intentions. Its use of high-profile institutional partnerships and public messaging campaigns points to a deliberate...
Owner
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Company.
This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Co-Owner
Established
Registered
Jurisdiction
Location
Category
Focus
Security
Ongoing Lawsuits
Trademark Filing
Major Donation
Donor Termination
Fraud Allegations
DMCA Abuse
CIA Impersonation
Website Credibility
Transparency Level
Associated Entities
Litigation Type
Media Sentiment
Public Records
Status
Registration
IRS
Missing
Amount
Charge
The Foundation falsely claimed to have been founded in 2015, despite being registered as a corporation in Delaware on October 12, 2022, and is not recognized as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit by the IRS, failing to comply with regulations to file Form 990.
The Foundation is accused of using a donation to the Atlantic Council to whitewash Gaurav and Sharon Srivastava’s reputation rather than functioning as a genuine nonprofit.
Gaurav Srivastava allegedly used the Foundation as a front to approach wealthy targets and enhance his image by associating with prominent figures like General Wesley Clark and Atlantic Council chief Fred Kempe.
The Atlantic Council terminated its relationship with the Foundation after discovering Gaurav Srivastava’s fraudulent activities, including a $1 million donation for the 2022 Global Food Security Forum that was used to bolster his credibility.
The Foundation is criticized for not functioning as a legitimate nonprofit, with its only identified activity being a donation to the Atlantic Council in November 2022, a month after its formation.
Critics argue that the Foundation’s strategy to address food and energy insecurity is flawed, lacking a thorough understanding of complex issues and oversimplifying solutions, potentially hindering meaningful legislative change.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
FBI Investigates Gaurav Srivastava for Posing as CIA Agent, Leading Atlantic Council to Sever Ties with Gaurav & Sharon Srivastava Family Foundation
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
Gaurav Srivastava Family Foundation sponsored a $1M+ Atlantic Council event amid Srivastava's alleged CIA spy impersonation scam targeting oil trader
NY Post article alleges Gaurav Srivastava, tied to his Family Foundation, posed as CIA operative to scam millions from oil trader, leading Democrats.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.3
1.7
2.7
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
The foundation’s messaging suggests impact and generosity, but the lack of independently verifiable activities points to potential deception. People donating or associating with it may have no real way of knowing where money or resources are going.
1/5
3/5
The Gaurav Sharon Srivastava Family Foundation presents itself as a philanthropic force, but digging deeper raises serious concerns. There’s no verified charitable status, and multiple reports suggest it may be operating as a corporate front rather than a legitimate nonprofit. That alone makes it hard to trust their stated mission.
The so-called foundation seems to be less about charity and more about optics. The claims about food and energy security were appealing, but when you see there’s no IRS registration, no 990 filings, and even the founding year appears fabricated, it screams red flag. Add in allegations of impersonating CIA officials and laundering money through these networks, and it becomes clear why federal authorities are reportedly investigating. The high-profile events, photo ops, and luxury lifestyle might look impressive on Instagram, but they mask what could be criminal activity underneath.
2/5
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.
Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.
Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.
Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.
Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.
Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.
BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.
Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.