Published - December 16, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.7

1.8

User Score

2.5

Trust Score

2.9

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About GGzE

GGzE is a major mental health organization based in Eindhoven, Netherlands, providing services to approximately 12,000 clients. The institution focuses on delivering psychiatric care, therapy, and support to individuals with diverse mental health needs. GGzE operates under a structured governance model, including a Supervisory Board and an enterprise council.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Facebook
@ggzeindhoven
Instagram
@ggzeindhoven
YouTube
@GGzEindhoven
Director's Email
[email protected]
Director's LinkedIn
@machteldploeg

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on GGzE?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Full Name

Stichting GGz Eindhoven en De Kempen
eyeimg

Abbreviation

GGzE
eyeimg

Organization Type

Non-profit foundation
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Netherlands
eyeimg

Primary Location

Eindhoven region
eyeimg

Category

Mental Healthcare
eyeimg

Website

www.ggze.nl
eyeimg

Former Board Member

Machteld Ploeg
eyeimg

Key Controversy Figures

Machteld Ploeg
eyeimg

Key Controversy Figures

Peter Littooij
eyeimg

Key Controversy Figures

Joep Verbugt
eyeimg

Trustpilot Rating

2.0 out of 5
eyeimg

Common Complaints

Dangerously bad policy
eyeimg

Common Complaints

unsafe environment
eyeimg

Adverse Media Coverage

Leadership conflicts

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

GGzE experienced a high‑profile governance crisis in 2022 involving internal board conflicts that led to the suspension and dismissal of executives, including Peter Littooij and Machteld Ploeg.

Internal power struggles and lack of transparency in decision‑making at GGzE raised serious governance concerns among stakeholders.

Employees reportedly described a workplace climate of fear and intimidation during the leadership dispute.

A lawsuit was filed involving GGzE’s enterprise and client councils challenging executive suspensions, highlighting organizational turmoil.

The governance crisis prompted warnings from the client council that mental health service continuity could be jeopardized.

Patient review platforms show complaints about poor communication, unmet treatment expectations, and errors in care administration at GGzE.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on GGzE?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on GGzE?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

trustpilot.com

Visit Link

GGzE receives overwhelmingly negative Trustpilot feedback with poor service experiences and low satisfaction from clients

  • First Detected

    13/11/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    First Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Review
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint
coming

intelligenceline.com

Visit Link

Machteld Ploeg’s leadership scrutiny GGzE dismissal, legal conflict, and reputational decline raise serious professional concerns

  • First Detected

    04/05/2023
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

financescam.com

Visit Link

Machteld Ploeg faces serious scam allegations and red flags over opaque financial ventures and risk‑laden operation

  • First Detected

    21/11/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2023 GGzE faces governance turmoil with board dismissals, leadership conflicts, an...
redflag
2022 GGzE board dismissed after leadership conflict, urgent search for interim dir...

Financial Profile for GGzE

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for GGzE?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
GGzE

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for GGzE

GGzE is a major mental health organization based in Eindhoven, Netherlands, providing services to approximately 12,000 clients. The institution focuses on delivering psychiatric care, therapy, and support to individuals with diverse mental health needs. GGzE operates under a structured governance model, including a Supervisory Board and an enterprise council.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1

Safety

1.7

Brand

1

Risk

3.3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Veronika Blaha
    January 27, 2026 at 12:41 pm

Employees and insiders described a toxic work environment and fear of retaliation during the leadership turmoil, which doesn’t inspire confidence in internal stability.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Robert Klein
    January 27, 2026 at 12:40 pm

A major leadership crisis in 2022 led to board suspensions and legal battles — a sign of deep governance failures that affected staff morale and possibly client services.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Marcus Odom
    January 27, 2026 at 7:10 am

I’ve had some personal experience with GGzE and while their size is impressive, the bureaucracy can be frustrating. Appointments often take weeks to schedule, and communication between departments feels disjointed. For an organization handling thousands of clients, responsiveness matters, and here it sometimes feels like you’re just another number in the system

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.