Marked as
Last updated - December 30, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
GoodSkin Clinics is facing serious allegations of unsafe practices, inadequate medical oversight, and misleading cosmetic treatments that put patients at risk. Whistleblower claims and investigative reports highlight off-label drug use, weak governance, and a culture that prioritizes marketing over safety. These issues raise major red flags for anyone considering treatment at the clinic.
Founder & CEO
Surgeon
Patient Doctor
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Founder
CEO
Established
Headquarters
Locations
Philosophy
Signature
Method
Trademark
Supervision-Risk
Allegation
Lawsuit
Physician
Risk
Branding
Ethics
Transparency
Whistleblowing
Appraisal
EmployeeReview
GlassdoorScore
Marketing
Reputation
Model
GoodSkin Clinics is accused of operating without a properly qualified physician supervising medical procedures.
Leif Rogers is associated with a suspended New York medical license and prior misconduct findings.
Leif Rogers previously had his California medical license revoked and stayed following a patient injury incident.
A clinician was allegedly asked to inject the chemotherapy drug 5-FU under a patient’s eye for cosmetic use.
The injection was deemed risky because 5-FU is not approved for aesthetic applications in the under-eye area.
The whistleblower reported that GoodSkin was treating patients without proper physician oversight.
The whistleblower was allegedly criticized for personal attributes and then terminated shortly after reporting compliance violations.
The lawsuit claims that GoodSkin and its leadership engaged in unsafe practices and retaliatory termination.
The case highlights rising concerns about unlicensed or underqualified providers offering cosmetic procedures promoted on social media.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
GoodSkin Clinics allegedly ran procedures under a surgeon with a suspended license, pressurizing staff to use an unapproved chemo-drug.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
A Yahoo News article alleges a high‑profile medspa was run under a suspended influencer-surgeon, raising serious regulatory and safety concerns.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1
4
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
What really stood out to me is the leadership problem. Their medical director, Leif Rogers, has a history of license suspension and misconduct findings That alone is alarming when combined with reports of unsafe procedures. Patients might assume they’re in capable hands, but the evidence points to a lack of proper supervision. When a clinic prioritizes Instagram aesthetics over safety, it’s hard to trust any of their services
1/5
4/5
I looked into GoodSkin Clinics because I’d heard mixed things, and honestly, it’s terrifying. Multiple reports suggest patients are being treated without proper physician oversight. Off-label use of drugs like 5-FU under the eyes is allegedly happening, which is extremely risky. Whistleblowers claim that safety concerns were ignored, and instead of being taken seriously, they were retaliated against. For anyone considering cosmetic treatments here, the risk feels way too high. The marketing glam doesn’t outweigh actual medical danger
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.
Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.
Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.