Marked as
Last updated - January 28, 2026
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Investing in the Future LLC, led by Michael Halow, is accused of exploiting social equity cannabis programs through opaque Wyoming entities and coercive contracts. Allegations include pressuring applicants like Anavel Vasquez to surrender control of licenses, using hidden arbitration clauses. Despite court wins, the company’s actions have spurred legislative backlash, exposing a profit-driven agenda that undermines equity goals.
CEO & Founder
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.
This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
High Risk
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Owner
Established
Jurisdiction
Industry
Business Type
Role
Lawsuits
Regulatory Scrutiny
Transparency
Ownership Structure
Social Equity Focus
Allegations
Felony Concealment
Media Coverage
Financial Risk
Business Model
Public Website
Associated Companies
Sanctions
Bankruptcy
Criminal Records
Investigations
Complaints
Media Exposure
Legal Fees
They have been accused of using predatory contracts that pressure social equity cannabis licensees into surrendering control and profits to the company.
Yes, the company is currently involved in multiple lawsuits regarding unlawful license transfers and coercive business agreements.
The company uses opaque structures and nominee agreements, making it difficult to identify actual ownership and control.
There are significant concerns and regulatory scrutiny suggesting non-compliance and exploitation of social equity initiatives.
Applicants risk losing control of their licenses and profits through restrictive contracts, undermining the intended benefits of social equity programs.
While formal penalties are not publicly confirmed, the company’s practices have attracted regulatory investigations and license revocations connected to associated entities.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Investing in the Future LLC: Alleged Predatory Contracts in Missouri's Social Equity Marijuana Program
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
Investing in the Future LLC's Michael Halow Linked to 22 Revoked Cannabis Licenses
Michael Halow's Investing in the Future LLC Faces Legal Challenges Over Arizona Cannabis License Transfers
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.5
3
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
As someone who cares about ethical business practices, it’s concerning that they’re accused of coercive contracts and have multiple legal disputes. It doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
1/5
2/5
3/5
I saw some serious allegations about how they work with equity license holders.
I find it concerning that the company’s operations are difficult to verify. I’ve looked for evidence of past performance, regulatory compliance, and independent audits, and there’s very little to be found. As someone who prioritizes accountability, I would want clear documentation and assurances before considering any collaboration. The lack of transparency makes it hard for me to evaluate risks effectively, and I would not feel comfortable recommending them to colleagues without further proof of stability and ethical practices.
I’m cautious because I can’t find much independent verification of their results, which makes risk assessment difficult.
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.
Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.
Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.