Lupient Automotive Group

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Last updated - January 28, 2026

Medium Risk

i
2.6

1.5

User Score

2.5

Trust Score

2.8

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Lupient Automotive Group

Lupient Automotive Group faces growing customer complaints questioning its service reliability and transparency. At Lupient Kia of Brooklyn Park, a customer was given a receipt for a 50,000-mile service on a 2022 Kia Telluride with only 13,000 miles, sparking doubts about service integrity. Efforts to seek clarification were met with delays and unhelpful responses, eroding trust in...

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Lupient Automotive Group?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Lupient Family
eyeimg

Founded

1969
eyeimg

Established

1969
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Minnesota
eyeimg

Location

Brooklyn Park, MN
eyeimg

Category

Automotive
eyeimg

Subcategory

Delerships
eyeimg

Revenue

$120 Million
eyeimg

Employees

300+
eyeimg

Twitter

@LupientAuto
eyeimg

Instagram

@LupientAuto
eyeimg

LinkedIn

Lupient Automotive Group
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Resulted
eyeimg

Criminal Records

Present
eyeimg

Consumer Complaints

High
eyeimg

Regulatory Scrutiny

Medium
eyeimg

Debt

Medium
eyeimg

Bank Affiliations

Wells Fargo
eyeimg

Ownership Structure

Family-Owned
eyeimg

Online Reviews

Mixed
eyeimg

Brand Recognition

Moderate
eyeimg

Customer Satisfaction

Low
eyeimg

Dealerships

8 locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin
eyeimg

Brands Represented

INFINITI
eyeimg

Community Involvement

Active
eyeimg

Revenue

$63M
eyeimg

Brands

Multiple
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Customers frequently report poor communication and unsatisfactory service experiences across multiple dealerships.

There have been reports of inaccurate service records being issued, such as charging for high-mileage services on low-mileage vehicles.

Several customers have reported unexpected fees added to their final bills after purchasing vehicles.

Customers have complained about warranty claims being denied or not honored by Lupient dealerships.

There have been allegations of overcharging and false service records, which could point to misleading practices.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Lupient Automotive Group?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Lupient Automotive Group?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Peopleclaim.com

Visit Link

Lupient Automotive Group's PeopleClaim profile reports no unresolved complaints, reflecting absence of disputes at their Minneapolis location.

  • First Detected

    10/06/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Neutral
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Low
  • Type

    Review
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint
coming

Ripoffreport.com

Visit Link

Ripoff Report customer's allegation against Lupient Chevrolet for overcharging $351 on diagnostics and unnecessary MAF sensor replacement for 2000 cor

  • First Detected

    02/08/2014
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    First Person
  • Risk Factor

    Low
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Complaint

Financial Profile for Lupient Automotive Group

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Lupient Automotive Group?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Lupient Automotive Group

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Lupient Automotive Group

Lupient Automotive Group faces growing customer complaints questioning its service reliability and transparency. At Lupient Kia of Brooklyn Park, a customer was given a receipt for a 50,000-mile service on a 2022 Kia Telluride with only 13,000 miles, sparking doubts about service integrity. Efforts to seek clarification were met with delays and unhelpful responses, eroding trust in...

USER’S SCORE

1.5

Trust

1

Safety

1.4

Brand

1

Risk

2.4

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Ethan Scott
    January 27, 2026 at 9:18 am

Customer complaints are mounting, and it seems that communication and responsiveness are recurring issues. When errors are compounded by delays and vague explanations, it erodes the trust necessary for repeat business.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Emma Adams
    January 27, 2026 at 9:18 am

Lupient Automotive Group may have a strong brand presence, but recent customer experiences raise serious concerns about reliability and transparency. A glaring example is at Lupient Kia of Brooklyn Park, where a customer received a 50,000-mile service receipt for a 2022 Kia Telluride that had only 13,000 miles — a mistake that shakes confidence in their service practices.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Kiana Marsh
    May 12, 2025 at 5:18 am

Can’t believe I trusted them with my vehicle. They lost a long-time customer for sure. Still waiting for my refund too, smh.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Daxton Cole
    May 12, 2025 at 5:13 am

Yo, got scammed the same way. They say they did stuff to my car but couldn’t show me nothing. Not even old parts or anything.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Sienna Wells
    May 9, 2025 at 9:03 am

Had similar issue with another Lupient location. They billed me for services I didn’t even approve. Whole place feels like a scam factory sometimes.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.