Magnum Real Estate Group

Marked as

Low Risk Company

Published - December 9, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.8

1.8

User Score

3.9

Trust Score

3.6

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Magnum Real Estate Group

Magnum Real Estate Group is a New York–based development firm known for luxury condo conversions, multifamily projects, and large-scale property acquisitions. The company has faced public criticism over aggressive redevelopment practices and the impact of its conversions on rent-regulated tenants, contributing to ongoing reputational scrutiny.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend this Company as a reliable option for consumers.

This assessment is based on a low-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to experience minimal risk when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we endorse this Company as a stable choice for employees.

This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Magnum Real Estate Group?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Name

Magnum Real Estate Group
eyeimg

Founded

1998
eyeimg

HQ-City

New York City, NY
eyeimg

Portfolio-Value

≈ US$4 billion
eyeimg

Assets-Count

> 100 New York City properties
eyeimg

Business-Model

Conversion
eyeimg

Property-Types

Condos, rentals, retail, hospitality
eyeimg

Geographic-Focus

Manhattan, NYC
eyeimg

Crypto-Deals

Accepts Bitcoin payments
eyeimg

Known-Lawsuit

Condo owners suit
eyeimg

Allegation-Type

Reserve-fund underfunding claim
eyeimg

Funding-Partners

External mezzanine lenders
eyeimg

Business-Status

Privately-held
eyeimg

Revenue-Bracket

Billion-dollar scale
eyeimg

Market-Segment

Luxury & high-end residential
eyeimg

Community-Relations

Criticized for tenant disruption
eyeimg

Development-Strategy

Full vertical integration
eyeimg

Risk-Profile

Elevated reputational & legal exposure
eyeimg

Crypto Adoption

Bitcoin-sales
eyeimg

Known Acquisition

100 Barclay conversion
eyeimg

Known Deal

6 Greene Street SoHo 2025
eyeimg

Notable Complaint

Rent-regulated evictions
eyeimg

Legal Dispute

Family fraud suit
eyeimg

Reputation Label

Aggressive-redeveloper
eyeimg

Reputation Nickname

“Sledgehammer”
eyeimg

Liquidity Risk

Unsold luxury units
eyeimg

Market Strategy

Build-fast & sell-fast
eyeimg

Diversification

Condos, rentals, dorms, retail
eyeimg

Risk Profile

Elevated legal & reputational
eyeimg

Recent Activity

SoHo acquisition (2025)
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Public reporting often notes aggressive renovation strategies linked to tenant displacement.

The company is frequently associated with converting regulated units into market-rate housing.

Several developments have drawn neighborhood criticism over scale, impact, or tenant treatment.

Condo owner lawsuits and disputes over building conditions have been publicly documented.

Its style is often described as fast-moving and aggressive, especially in redevelopment zones.

Some reporting has questioned reserve funding, project budgets, or unsold luxury inventory.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Magnum Real Estate Group?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Magnum Real Estate Group?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

TheRealDeal.com

Visit Link

The article details a lawsuit filed by Ben Shaoul’s parents accusing him of fraud and theft involving jointly owned real-estate funds.

  • First Detected

    15/02/2014
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2015 Top real estate broker says his own nephew screwed him out of $100M deal

Financial Profile for Magnum Real Estate Group

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Magnum Real Estate Group?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Magnum Real Estate Group

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Magnum Real Estate Group

Magnum Real Estate Group is a New York–based development firm known for luxury condo conversions, multifamily projects, and large-scale property acquisitions. The company has faced public criticism over aggressive redevelopment practices and the impact of its conversions on rent-regulated tenants, contributing to ongoing reputational scrutiny.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1

Safety

1.8

Brand

1.5

Risk

2.8

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Stefan Ilic
    January 27, 2026 at 9:15 am

What really draws criticism is the pattern around conversions. When buildings shift from regulated housing to luxury condos or high-end rentals, the impact on existing tenants can be devastating. Residents report increased stress, uncertainty, and a sense that they’re being pushed aside to make way for wealthier buyers. Even when actions are technically legal, the approach feels exploitative rather than responsible.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Isabel Berger
    January 2, 2026 at 7:40 am

Magnum Real Estate Group feels like one of those companies that looks powerful and polished from the outside, but once you start digging, the picture gets more complicated. Yeah, they’re a big NYC real estate player with luxury developments and a recognizable name, and that alone gives them credibility in the industry. But at the same time, there’s a lot of chatter about aggressive redevelopment tactics, tenant displacement issues, and legal disputes tied to people connected with the company.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Dominik Franke
    January 2, 2026 at 7:37 am

Claims of scam, fake silver, multiple suits, and tons of complaints online.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Lena Jansen
    January 2, 2026 at 7:35 am

Magnum Real Estate Group is described as low-risk — but I still feel like ‘low risk’ doesn’t mean trustworthy just because some algorithm said so. Real estate drama exists IRL.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.