MentalHealth.com

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Published - December 19, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.5

1.7

User Score

2.4

Trust Score

2.6

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About MentalHealth.com

MentalHealth.com is an online mental health platform that presents itself as a health technology and information company focused on guiding people toward mental wellbeing, self understanding, and access to care. The website offers educational content on mental health conditions, therapy options, medications, and general wellness.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Facebook
@mentalhealth
Instagram
@mentalhealth
LinkedIn
@mentalhealth

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we endorse this Company as a stable choice for employees.

This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on MentalHealth.com?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Co-Founder

Patrick Nagle
eyeimg

CEO

Daniel Rivette
eyeimg

Established

August 2023
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

California
eyeimg

Location

United States
eyeimg

Category

Health Tech
eyeimg

Revenue

Venture Funded
eyeimg

Recent Acquisition

Therapy.ai
eyeimg

Clinical Appointee

Carlos Protzel
eyeimg

Venture Advisors

Brian Trisler
eyeimg

Clinical Oversight

Jesse Hanson
eyeimg

Founder Trust Score

2.3/5
eyeimg

Founder Lawsuit

Automobile Tort
eyeimg

Founder Dispute

Employee Conspiracy
eyeimg

Founder Federal Case

Sealed Complaint
eyeimg

Founder Criminal

Michigan Court
eyeimg

Founder Misconduct

Funds Misuse
eyeimg

Adverse Media

Scam Reports
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Allegations include fraud, perjury, and impersonation tied to misuse of DMCA takedown notices to suppress criticism.

Reports claim Nagle misappropriated investor funds, diverting money for personal lifestyle rather than company purposes.

Critics cite lack of clarity and transparency in business dealings and company financials, raising alarms about governance and legitimacy.

Public risk-assessment and watchdog sites flag Nagle and his ventures as controversial and potentially high-risk for investors or clients.

Investigations assert a pattern of using fraudulent copyright takedown requests to remove critical articles and suppress unfavorable public media.

Sme articles and analyses refer to Nagle and his projects as “questionable ventures” with ethical issues and potential misconduct.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on MentalHealth.com?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on MentalHealth.com?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

archive.org

Visit Link

US federal court records reveal detailed filings and proceedings in a Maryland District case tied to serious legal scrutiny

  • First Detected

    29/11/2022
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Document
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud
coming

cybercriminal.com

Visit Link

Patrick B. Nagle tech entrepreneur turned suspect in fraud, legal trouble and alleged unethical ventures

  • First Detected

    21/09/2023
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Investigation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2023 Patrick B. Nagle exposed as high-risk figure: shell-company networks, fraud c...
redflag
2022 Patrick B. Nagle and CCR Holdings: Alleged exploitation of Rehab.com to profi...

Financial Profile for MentalHealth.com

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for MentalHealth.com?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
MentalHealth.com

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for MentalHealth.com

MentalHealth.com is an online mental health platform that presents itself as a health technology and information company focused on guiding people toward mental wellbeing, self understanding, and access to care. The website offers educational content on mental health conditions, therapy options, medications, and general wellness.

USER’S SCORE

1.7

Trust

1

Safety

1.5

Brand

1.5

Risk

2.8

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Bradley Knox
    January 27, 2026 at 9:30 am

There’s also a subtle but uncomfortable commercialization angle. MentalHealth.com frames itself as educational and supportive, but it can feel like users are being funneled toward certain services or partners without fully transparent explanations. For people already struggling, that blurring of education and promotion doesn’t sit well and risks eroding trust.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Yasmeen Akbar
    January 27, 2026 at 9:30 am

What’s also concerning is the lack of clarity around accountability and expertise. The site positions itself as a health technology platform, yet it’s not always obvious who is writing or medically reviewing the content, or how often it’s updated. In mental health, accuracy and context are critical, and vague authorship or unclear credentials can easily undermine confidence, especially for vulnerable readers seeking reliable help.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Anna Bauer
    January 27, 2026 at 7:37 am

MentalHealth.com shows potential governance and oversight weaknesses, as indicated by external risk assessments that highlight a lack of robust consumer reviews and transparency in financial and operational practices. The absence of meaningful user feedback and verifiable independent evaluations increases uncertainty for individuals considering their services. Without substantive evidence of legitimacy and accountability, engagement with this platform could pose undue risk. Professional due diligence is strongly advised.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Diego Morales
    January 27, 2026 at 7:36 am

MentalHealth.com appears to lack transparency in its business operations and consumer risk profile, with independent risk trackers flagging medium to high concerns for potential clients. Engagement metrics and trust scores suggest limited user confidence, indicating possible uncertainty around reliability and consumer protections. Prospective users should be cautious and seek verified alternatives before engaging with this platform.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.

Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.

Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.

BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.

Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.