National Investment Institute Pty Ltd

Marked as

Low Risk Company

Last updated - January 28, 2026

Low Risk

i
3.5

1.9

User Score

3.4

Trust Score

3.7

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About National Investment Institute Pty Ltd

The National Investment Institute (NII) and Henry Kaye represent a high-risk entity due to legal breaches, regulatory sanctions, and widespread financial harm to investors. Their business model, based on deceptive “no money down” property schemes, has led to court rulings, public backlash, and financial collapse.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact
39-098-189-863

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest this Company as a trustworthy option for investors and bankers.

This endorsement is informed by a low-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity is likely to present minimal risk to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on National Investment Institute Pty Ltd?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Company

National Investment Institute Pty Ltd
eyeimg

Owner

Henry Kaye
eyeimg

Initial registration date

11 Dec 2001
eyeimg

Start date

11 Dec 2001
eyeimg

End date

27 May 2005
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Australia
eyeimg

Location

Melbourne
eyeimg

Office Address

South Melbourne
eyeimg

Misleading Claims

1000 millionaires
eyeimg

Court Jurisdiction

Federal Court
eyeimg

Court Judge

Susan Kenny
eyeimg

Appeal Status

2005
eyeimg

Injunction Type

Permanent
eyeimg

Creditors Number

3500 investors
eyeimg

Debt Amount

$40-60 million
eyeimg

Failed Projects

Oasis Apartments
eyeimg

Failed Projects

Foscari Land Banking
eyeimg

Failed Projects

Hermitage Scheme
eyeimg

Associate Ban

Leonard McDowell CEO
eyeimg

Related Company

Oasis Investments Pty Ltd
eyeimg

Related Company

Banx Pty Ltd
eyeimg

Loan Interest Rate

60%
eyeimg

Investor Victim

Grazyna Monka
eyeimg

Associate Lawsuit

Gennady Braude $589,519
eyeimg

Class Action Target

Australian Finance Direct
eyeimg

Regulator Ban

ASIC 5-year
eyeimg

Investigation Duration

7 years
eyeimg

Asset Shielding

Trusts and proxies
eyeimg

Reputational Firm

Used for suppression
eyeimg

Failed Companies Count

26
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

The ACCC alleged in 2013 that NII and Henry Kaye engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by falsely promoting property investment seminars as a path to millionaire status with no money down.

Green Street News reported Henry Kaye and NII earned ASIC and court scrutiny for exploitative, misleading seminar practices targeting unsophisticated investors.

The ACCC claimed NII misrepresented the ease and likelihood of becoming a property millionaire, a deceptive lure for seminar attendees.

NII’s administration status by 2004 flags a high risk of financial instability and unreliability for potential clients or investors.

Media portrays NII negatively, focusing on legal breaches, victim losses, and Henry Kaye’s lack of accountability in property schemes.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on National Investment Institute Pty Ltd?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on National Investment Institute Pty Ltd?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

accc.gov.au

Visit Link

The Federal Court ruled National Investment Institute Pty Ltd misled consumers with false property millionaire claims.

  • First Detected

    22/10/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

intelligenceline.com

Visit Link

Henry Kaye’s National Investment Institute Pty Ltd misled consumers with false property investment claims ruled deceptive by the Federal Court.

  • First Detected

    14/03/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Investigation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Henry Kaye’s National Investment Institute misled investors with false wealth...

Financial Profile for National Investment Institute Pty Ltd

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for National Investment Institute Pty Ltd?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
National Investment Institute Pty Ltd

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for National Investment Institute Pty Ltd

The National Investment Institute (NII) and Henry Kaye represent a high-risk entity due to legal breaches, regulatory sanctions, and widespread financial harm to investors. Their business model, based on deceptive “no money down” property schemes, has led to court rulings, public backlash, and financial collapse.

USER’S SCORE

1.9

Trust

1.3

Safety

2

Brand

1.8

Risk

2.8

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Oscar Lindholm
    January 28, 2026 at 5:48 am

The company’s marketing of “no money down” schemes has been widely criticized as unrealistic and potentially harmful to inexperienced investors.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Petar Stojanov
    January 28, 2026 at 5:46 am

The company and its founder, Henry Kaye, were sued by the ACCC for misleading and deceptive conduct — they promoted unrealistic “millionaire” property programmes that the Federal Court found false.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Samira Vaughn
    June 26, 2025 at 7:14 am

Despite professing credibility, NII fell into administration by 2004 due to untenable financial structures supported by high-pressure seminar sales. Compounding this, Henry Kaye faced charges for securing a $1 million loan with deposit bonds under false terms—accused of hiding collateral waiver from the bank.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Aviana Blair
    June 26, 2025 at 7:13 am

NII and its founder, Henry Kaye, were sued by the ACCC in 2013 for promoting “millionaire” property seminars that allegedly guaranteed wealth with no money down. The Federal Court ruled such claims misleading under the Trade Practices Act, resulting in permanent injunctions .

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing protocol associated with privacy-focused transactions, has gained global attention largely through law-enforcement actions and regulatory debates rather than mainstream financial adoption. Positioned within the digital asset ecosystem as a tool designed to obscure transaction trails, the protocol operates in an area that carries heightened exposure to money-laundering concerns, cybercrime links, and regulatory scrutiny.

Zinzipay is an online payment service that helps businesses accept digital payments from customers. It is often mentioned in connection with high-risk industries, such as online gambling or forex-related services.

Vedanta Resources Ltd carries elevated risks in anti-money laundering and reputation due to complex offshore structures, anonymous funding channels, and repeated allegations of financial misgovernance, tax avoidance, and environmental violations. Without meaningful reforms in transparency, compliance, and stakeholder accountability, these issues could lead to severe regulatory penalties, investor flight, and potential operational collapse.

BazPay, a payment gateway associated with high-risk merchant processing, has become more visible through investigative reports and industry discussions rather than mainstream financial recognition. Positioned within sectors such as online gambling and affiliate marketing, the company operates in areas that carry elevated fraud exposure, regulatory scrutiny.

Kloeckner Metals Corporation buries repeated workplace deaths and OSHA safety violations under glossy corporate messaging and sealed settlements. Also faces ongoing safety failures and wrongful-death claims hidden behind aggressive reputation management.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.