Petra Group

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Published - December 25, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.1

2

User Score

2.3

Trust Score

1.9

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Petra Group

Petra Group is a Malaysian conglomerate chaired by Vinod Sekhar that, in early 2024, was sued by a group of former employees and international investors who allege fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and unpaid debts in connection with business ventures including Green Rubber Global

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

LinkedIn
The PETRA Group
Youtube.com
PETRA Group
Facebook
PETRA Group

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

High Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Company.

This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Petra Group?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Chairman

Datuk Vinod Sekhar
eyeimg

CEO

Datuk Vinod Sekhar
eyeimg

Spouse

Winy Yeap
eyeimg

Established

1998
eyeimg

Headquarters

Kuala Lumpur
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Malaysia
eyeimg

Category

Diversified Conglomerate
eyeimg

Industries

Sustainable Technologies
eyeimg

Subsidiaries

Green Rubber PLC
eyeimg

Foundation

Vinod Sekhar Foundation
eyeimg

Revenue

$5 Million
eyeimg

Recent Incident

London Robbery
eyeimg

Health Procedure

Heart Transplant
eyeimg

Lawsuits

RM30m Fraud Claim
eyeimg

Investigation

MACC Laundering Probe
eyeimg

Bankruptcy

Vinod Sekhar Discharge
eyeimg

Adverse Media

Ventilator Scandal
eyeimg

Political Ties

Anwar Ibrahim Links
eyeimg

Media Venture

The Vibes Portal
eyeimg

Awards

Asia Responsible Enterprise Awards 2022
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Investor and Employee Fraud Claims
eyeimg

Investigations

MACC Money Laundering Probe
eyeimg

Past Controversies

Ventilator Sales to Hungary
eyeimg

Political Connections

Ties to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim
eyeimg

Bankruptcy History

Personal Discharge for Chairman
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

A Malaysian conglomerate involved in sustainable technologies, including rubber recycling , media, modular building, agriculture, and environmental solutions.

Datuk Vinod Sekhar, serving as chairman and CEO, with his wife Winy Yeap also involved in related ventures.

 

A RM30 million civil suit filed in 2023 by 12 investors and former employees alleging fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and debt acknowledgment.

 

Sekhar allegedly solicited funds for Green Rubber without disclosing his personal bankruptcy status at the time, leading to significant investor losses.

Plaintiffs claim he reassured investors that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim would resolve his bankruptcy issues, leveraging their friendship.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Petra Group?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Petra Group?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

malaysiakini.com

Visit Link

In this article, Vinod Sekhar faces lawsuits alleging fraud and misrepresentation by former employees and investors.

  • First Detected

    06/02/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud
coming

nst.com.my

Visit Link

Vinod Sekhar sued by investors, ex-employees for fraud

  • First Detected

    05/02/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2024 Investors, former employees suing Vinod Sekhar RM30m for alleged fraud; poten...
redflag
2025 Investors trusted tycoon Vinod Sekhar's high-profile image, court told in fra...

Financial Profile for Petra Group

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Petra Group?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Petra Group

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Petra Group

Petra Group is a Malaysian conglomerate chaired by Vinod Sekhar that, in early 2024, was sued by a group of former employees and international investors who allege fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and unpaid debts in connection with business ventures including Green Rubber Global

USER’S SCORE

2

Trust

1.3

Safety

2

Brand

1.7

Risk

3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Kevin Carter
    January 27, 2026 at 7:10 am

People can change, sure, but it’s not a small thing. If I were a brand or employer, I’d want a very thorough background check and clear answers before collaboration.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Jade Brooks
    January 27, 2026 at 7:09 am

I’ve seen good things about his writing, but the history from 2020 is disturbing. Even though the charges were dropped, I’d advise people to be careful about trusting anyone’s character solely on professional achievements.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Ian Archer
    January 27, 2026 at 7:04 am

Honestly this company gives me pause. Multiple lawsuits from investors and ex-employees claiming fraud and unpaid debts?

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.