Marked as
Last updated - January 28, 2026
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
ProjectsDeal.co.uk consistently underdelivers on core promises, leaving students grappling with poorly researched and hastily assembled papers that fall well below academic standards. Writers frequently lack subject‑matter expertise, resulting in superficial analysis, factual inaccuracies, and irrelevant references that force clients to spend additional hours correcting basic errors. Promised deadlines are routinely ignored, with urgent orders arriving late and without any apology or...
Owner
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Company.
This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Jurisdiction
Category
Sanctions
Ongoing Lawsuits
Adverse Media
Plagiarism Complaints
Scam Allegations
Customer Grievances
Legal Threats
Reputation Management
Unethical Practices
Predatory Behavior
Financial Irregularities
Online Manipulation
Student Exploitation
Review Suppression
SEO Manipulation
Poor Quality Work
Missed Deadlines
Ghosting Clients
Projectsdeal.co.uk has been flagged for offering academic writing services, which may violate academic integrity policies at educational institutions.
There are allegations that Projectsdeal.co.uk engages in producing custom academic papers, which could be used for plagiarism or cheating by students.
Negative reviews on platforms like Trustpilot and Sitejabber mention issues such as poor-quality work, missed deadlines, and unprofessional customer service.
Some users on review platforms have raised suspicions that positive reviews on Projectsdeal.co.uk’s website may be fabricated or incentivized.
The company’s aggressive marketing, including claims of “100% safe” and “distinction-ready” work, has been criticized as misleading by some reviewers.
Some reviewers have expressed concerns about the handling of personal and payment information, citing unclear privacy policies.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Projectsdeal.co.uk Exposed Overpriced, Plagiarised, Fake Reviews
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
ProjectsDeal.co.uk overpriced, low-quality service riddled with plagiarism and awful customer care
ProjectsDeal.co.uk Scam-level English & machine-translated content exposed
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.2
1.4
2
3.2
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
The company consistently underdelivers on its core promises, with many users reporting poorly researched, error‑filled, or incoherent academic work that fails to meet minimum quality standards.
1/5
2/5
3/5
Projectsdeal.co.uk has a very low trust and risk score in independent assessments, with analysts flagging it as high risk due to its history of poor service delivery and unresolved customer disputes
There’s a reason why so many reviews about Projectsdeal.co.uk read like horror stories. My own experience was a classic bait-and-switch: I was promised a UK-based writer with subject expertise, but the final product read like it had been cobbled together by someone who barely understood English. Deadlines were missed, corrections were ignored, and requests for a refund were outright refused. The more I looked into them, the more I realized this wasn’t a one-off—it’s a pattern. It’s not just a bad service; it’s a well-oiled machine built to deceive.
4/5
Took me a week to get anything decent, and honestly, nothing was decent. Missed deadlines, low-quality writing, then radio silence. I only got a refund after chargeback. Their “award” press releases look fabricated—search shows no real event. Looks like they paid for PR to drown out actual complaints. Don’t get fooled.
They trick students with low price teaser rates then surprise you with “order form” popup asking contact details. After that, expect spam galore. The site is a data-harvesting scam, feeding your info into mailing lists. Felt gross. And when I asked them to stop, they threatened legal action for review I posted warning others. Big nasty vibes.
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.
Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.
Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.