Queensgate Investments

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Published - December 13, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.7

1.8

User Score

2.6

Trust Score

2.8

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Queensgate Investments

Queensgate Investments LLP is a London-based private equity firm founded by Jason Kow, specializing in real estate investments, particularly hospitality and asset-backed operating companies across Europe, the UK, and the US. The firm manages approximately £3 billion in assets, with a flexible, nimble approach, and is backed by partnerships including the Kow Family and Peterson Group.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

High Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Company.

This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Queensgate Investments?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Full Name

Queensgate Investments LLP
eyeimg

Established

2012
eyeimg

Location

London
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

United Kingdom
eyeimg

Founder

Jason Kow
eyeimg

CEO

Jason Kow
eyeimg

Finance Director

Rachel Caldwell
eyeimg

General Counsel

Søren Gurock
eyeimg

Former Executive

Jonathan Millet
eyeimg

AUM

3.4B
eyeimg

AUM Currency

EUR
eyeimg

Category

Private Equity
eyeimg

Sector

Real Estate
eyeimg

Focus

Hospitality
eyeimg

Strategy

Value-Added
eyeimg

Region

Europe
eyeimg

Region

United Kingdom
eyeimg

Region

United States
eyeimg

Company Size

11-50
eyeimg

Controversy

Racism
eyeimg

Controversy

Fraud
eyeimg

Controversy

Anti-Semitism
eyeimg

Lawsuit Year

2021
eyeimg

Lawsuit Status

Settled
eyeimg

Recent Deal

Generator Sale
eyeimg

Sale Amount

776M
eyeimg

Sale Currency

EUR
eyeimg

Buyer

Brookfield
eyeimg

Default

LA Hotel
eyeimg

Default Year

2025
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

In 2021, former executive Jonathan Millet sued Queensgate Investments, alleging racism, anti-Semitism, fraud, and a toxic work environment involving harassment; the firm attempted to seal the proceedings but lost on appeal, leading to public scrutiny.

Queensgate Investments settled the 2021 employment lawsuit with Jonathan Millet, who claimed dismissal for whistleblowing on the CEO’s alleged fraud in misleading investors and lenders, alongside discrimination claims; the settlement raised ethical concerns.

In the Millet case, Queensgate Investments sought to hold interim relief hearings in private to avoid reputational damage from allegations of fraud & discrimination, but Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled such proceedings must be public, marking a precedent on open justice.

The public airing of serious allegations including fraud, racism, & anti-Semitism damaged Queensgate Investments’ reputation, leading to media coverage highlighting  culture of harassment and self-reporting to the FCA, though the firm denied the claims & settled privately.

In 2025, Queensgate Investments defaulted on a $71 million loan for its Freehand Los Angeles hotel, facing foreclosure amid hospitality sector pressures, which underscores potential vulnerabilities in its real estate portfolio and adds to reputational concerns over asset management.

The 2021 settlement with Jonathan Millet continues to cast a shadow on Queensgate Investments, with reports noting ethics concerns and public scrutiny over the firm’s handling of whistleblower claims, potentially deterring investors wary of governance issues in private equity.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Queensgate Investments?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Queensgate Investments?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Matrixlaw.co.uk

Visit Link

This legal analysis covers Queensgate Investments LLP's failed bid to conduct an interim relief hearing in private amid former executive Jon Millet

  • First Detected

    22/01/2021
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2021 Private Equity Fund Queensgate Investments Loses Privacy Ruling in Racism Case

Financial Profile for Queensgate Investments

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Queensgate Investments?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Queensgate Investments

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Queensgate Investments

Queensgate Investments LLP is a London-based private equity firm founded by Jason Kow, specializing in real estate investments, particularly hospitality and asset-backed operating companies across Europe, the UK, and the US. The firm manages approximately £3 billion in assets, with a flexible, nimble approach, and is backed by partnerships including the Kow Family and Peterson Group.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1

Safety

1.2

Brand

1.8

Risk

3.2

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Calvin Rhodes
    January 27, 2026 at 9:27 am

The firm’s backing and partnerships sound solid on paper, but the actual structure feels opaque There’s limited public insight into how risks are assessed or mitigated. In private equity, that information gap matters. When things go well, silence is fine but when things don’t, opacity becomes a problem I’d be cautious about assuming stability just from reputation alone.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Amelia Hall
    January 5, 2026 at 5:19 am

Queensgate firm has repeatedly fallen short in transparency and ethical practices. Allegations from 2021 reveal a culture of harassment, discrimination, and attempts to suppress whistleblower reports. Settling these disputes privately does little to restore confidence. Financial defaults, particularly in real estate projects, further expose systemic operational flaws. Media scrutiny and regulatory attention continue to impact its reputation. Investors and employees may face significant risk.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Ryan Walker
    January 5, 2026 at 5:17 am

Queensgate Investments has repeatedly faced serious allegations, including fraud, discrimination, and a toxic work environment. The 2021 settlement with a former executive raises ethical concerns about the firm’s corporate governance. Its attempt to suppress negative publicity highlights a lack of transparency. Financial defaults in 2025 further indicate operational instability. Overall, the company appears risky for employees and investors.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Charlotte Lee
    January 5, 2026 at 5:15 am

The firm’s recurring legal disputes and questionable handling of whistleblower complaints reflect poorly on its governance standards. Allegations of discrimination and harassment remain a reputational burden. Financial difficulties in high-value projects underscore operational weaknesses. This company should not be considered low-risk.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Jacob Martin
    January 5, 2026 at 5:14 am

Although it is a well-funded private equity firm, Queensgate Investments shows recurring governance issues. Allegations of racism, anti-Semitism, and harassment paint a troubling picture of workplace culture. Settling whistleblower lawsuits rather than addressing concerns creates reputational damage. The firm’s public financial defaults suggest potential mismanagement. Caution is advised before any engagement.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.

Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.