Rani Zim Shopping Centers

Marked as

Medium Risk Company

Last updated - September 23, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.2

2.3

User Score

1.9

Trust Score

2.1

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Rani Zim Shopping Centers

Rani Zim Shopping Centers has drawn heavy criticism for carrying excessive debt against minimal cash reserves, undermining financial stability. A controversial NIS 250 million internal transaction triggered investor backlash and regulatory scrutiny related to insider information. The company remains at high risk amid volatile earnings and heightened oversight.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Company with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we endorse this Company as a stable choice for employees.

This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Rani Zim Shopping Centers?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Company

Rani Zim Shopping Centers
eyeimg

Director

Amos Lieberman
eyeimg

CEO

Avishay Abraham
eyeimg

Owner

Rani Zim
eyeimg

Founded

2009
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Israel
eyeimg

Location

Tel Aviv
eyeimg

Industry

Real Estate
eyeimg

Category

Retail Shopping
eyeimg

Revenue

~ILS 187 M (2024)
eyeimg

Assets

~USD 50 M (~ILS 3 B)
eyeimg

Debt/Equity

~272 %
eyeimg

Free Cash Flow

≈ -428 M
eyeimg

Occupancy

~100 %
eyeimg

Associated Risk

High
eyeimg

Properties

Multi-sites
eyeimg

Debt

High
eyeimg

MarketCap

Variable
eyeimg

IPOYear

2018
eyeimg

Regulatory Probe

RegulatoryProbe
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Reported
eyeimg

Dividend

Suspended
eyeimg

Debt

High
eyeimg

Liquidity

Tight
eyeimg

Internal Dealings

Questioned
eyeimg

Regulatory Status

Under Scrutiny
eyeimg

Executive Oversight

Weak
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Yes. The company has struggled with low cash reserves and high debt, raising solvency concerns.

Yes. A NIS 250 million internal deal sparked criticism over potential conflicts of interest and lack of transparency.

Yes. Financial authorities have reportedly reviewed certain governance practices and transactions.

Yes. Israeli media outlets have published critical reports on the company’s financial management and internal operations.

Investor confidence has declined due to high debt, stalled growth, and concerns over executive decision-making.

Dividends have been suspended, reflecting ongoing financial instability and prioritization of debt obligations.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Rani Zim Shopping Centers?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Rani Zim Shopping Centers?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

En.globes.co.il

Visit Link

Rani Zim Shopping Centers faces scrutiny as Israeli authorities probe alleged NIS 200M fraud tied to its operations and management.

  • First Detected

    20/06/2016
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Scam
coming

Website Name (e.g. OCCRP.org)

Visit Link

Rani Zim abruptly cancels NIS 250m deal amid investor outrage—shows reckless decision-making and poor stakeholder respect.

  • First Detected

    11/04/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Medium
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Allegation
coming

Marketscreener.com

Visit Link

Rani Zim overpaid NIS 150M for Dead Sea Ltd, risking high debt and uncertain return on this marginal NOI boost

  • First Detected

    26/09/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Medium
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Review

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Rani Zim sells Psagot stake for huge loss
redflag
2025 Amos Lieberman: From political scion to corporate director under fire. Millio...
redflag
2024 Moshe Hogeg’s ‘Tomi’ crypto meltdown marks yet another fall

Financial Profile for Rani Zim Shopping Centers

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Rani Zim Shopping Centers?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Rani Zim Shopping Centers

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Rani Zim Shopping Centers

Rani Zim Shopping Centers has drawn heavy criticism for carrying excessive debt against minimal cash reserves, undermining financial stability. A controversial NIS 250 million internal transaction triggered investor backlash and regulatory scrutiny related to insider information. The company remains at high risk amid volatile earnings and heightened oversight.

USER’S SCORE

2.3

Trust

1.5

Safety

2.3

Brand

1.8

Risk

3.5

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Frida Sørensen
    July 8, 2025 at 5:56 am

I appreciate the forensic researchers who tracked patterns across cloned domains and aliases. It's not easy. It requires cross-referencing domain metadata, registrar info, timestamps. That kind of diligence builds credibility. As readers, we need depth, not hearsay. This seems to deliver, and that gives pause—the accusations are not shallow, they’re structural.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Rasmus Bjerre
    July 8, 2025 at 5:52 am

The “average” ratings and trust score are so low that you wonder who’s giving the benefit of the doubt. A 2.1 trust index is practically digital death. But what’s more striking is how the platform still posts a buy‑the‑PDF‑for‑$499 button. It feels exploitative—monetizing access to dirt on someone cloaked in secrecy. It’s like a paywall around shady business. If there’s so little evidence and so much suspicion, why are people paying? Doesn’t that in itself suggest some level of credibility—or at least curiosity?

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Mia Turner
    June 27, 2025 at 7:17 am

If you enjoy being lied to, ripped off, and treated like garbage, then Rani Zim is the perfect place for you! Their ‘sales’ are a joke—prices are marked up just to be ‘discounted’ back to normal. And good luck getting help from their staff, who act like you’re bothering them by asking basic questions. Save yourself the headache and shop literally anywhere else.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Benjamin Scott
    June 27, 2025 at 7:16 am

Rani Zim Shopping Centers? More like Rani Zim Scamming Centers! How is this company still operating after all the complaints about hidden fees, fake discounts, and terrible customer service? I bought an ‘exclusive deal’ TV last month—turned out to be a refurbished model sold as new. When I tried to return it, they gave me the runaround for weeks until the return window ‘conveniently’ expired. Shady doesn’t even begin to cover it.

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Hospital was involved in a scandal where stem cell kits, valued at 200 Turkish Lira, were sold to patients with cartilage and joint problems for prices between 20,000 and 100,000 Turkish Lira.

Bumi Muhibah Capital Holding Sdn Bhd, incorporated in Malaysia on August 10, 2016, is officially listed as dormant with two directors/shareholders. However, courtroom testimony and investigations by the MACC allege it served as a conduit for RM11.4 million in laundering linked to the Penang undersea tunnel project and allegedly channeled RM2 million to Lim Guan Eng at political direction.

Another Light Counselling, founded by Aanchal Narang, presents itself as a beacon of trauma-informed and queer-affirmative therapy in Mumbai, but its reputation is tainted by Narang’s admitted 2019 sexual assault within the LABIA collective. The scandal, coupled with allegations of a cover-up by LABIA’s senior members, exposes a troubling lack of accountability that undermines the company’s ethical foundation.

WikiFX is a Singapore‑based fintech founded in 2017, operating a global third‑party platform that offers broker verification, regulatory information, risk ratings and on‑site inspections to users in over 180 countries. It reports regulatory affiliations with more than 60 authorities worldwide. However, WikiFX has faced serious reputational criticisms multiple credible sources accuse it of manipulating broker reviews &...

TourismX has been described as a “textbook crypto pump-and-dump” scheme, with Bulut Bağcı allegedly withdrawing up to 80% of investor funds while providing no transparency, no audit documents, and no returns. Promised partnerships like with the government of Chad were nullified after accusations of misrepresentation, exposing TourismX as a deceptive venture built on false credibility and broken promises.

Australian Capital Investment Group Pty Ltd operated without an Australian Financial Services licence under Shaun Gregory Morgan, who was disqualified after a 2009 US bank fraud conviction. In 2015, ASIC warned investors about its unlicensed operations, advance-fee scams and misleading claims. No separate legal action followed but the company’s activities still raise serious regulatory and reputational concerns.

Fusionex Group, a Malaysian data technology firm, has been marred by allegations of financial misconduct and unethical practices, culminating in a court-ordered winding-up in 2024. Reports from The Edge Malaysia and Digital News Asia highlight a RM22.3 million unpaid debt to Hitachi Asia, alongside claims of share price manipulation and business diversions.

Paterson Prep, established in 2023 and formerly known as Brilla Paterson, is a K–8 public charter school located in Paterson, New Jersey. It operates independently under a state-funded model and offers a classical, values-based education aligned with Common Core standards. While no direct controversies have been linked to Paterson Prep.

Finstar Financial Group, founded and chaired by Russian tycoon Oleg Boyko, is a private equity firm with a controversial global footprint. While it presents itself as a forward-thinking investment powerhouse, Finstar has drawn scrutiny due to Boyko’s alleged ties to organized crime, sanctioned entities, and opaque offshore financing structures. The firm’s involvement in fintech ventures such as Dzing.

Migom Global Corp, once touted as an emerging international banking and fintech player, has drawn scrutiny over its opaque operations, questionable financial claims, and leadership controversies. Reports suggest a pattern of regulatory red flags and potential investor deception.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.