Marked as
Last updated - December 29, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Richard Sajiun, the owner of Sajiun Electric, a New York-based electrical contracting firm, has been a prominent figure in the industry. However, his career has been marred by serious legal disputes and allegations of fraudulent activities. Despite the company’s success, Sajiun’s tenure has been overshadowed by legal controversies. In 2021, Maureen Fritch filed a lawsuit against Sajiun Electric.
CEO
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Company Name
Full Name
Owner
Founder
Established
Taken Over
Jurisdiction
Primary Location
Category
Industry
Specialization
Certification
Revenue Range
Employees
Lawsuit Year
Plaintff
Allegations
Allegations 2
Allegations 3
Court Decision
Co-Defendant
Partnership
Controversies
Reputation Impact
Sajiun Electric and its owner Richard Sajiun were named in a 2021 lawsuit by Maureen Fritch, accusing them of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment through asset diversion from E. Electrical Contracting, LLC. Allegations included concealing assets.
Media outlets like CyberCriminal.com and IntelligenceLine have highlighted Sajiun Electric’s involvement in fraud allegations, portraying it as a potential sham company used for fraudulent activities. Reports emphasize Richard Sajiun’s legal battles, deceptive sales tactics.
Public court documents from cases like Fritch v. Bron detail allegations against Sajiun Electric for aiding in the diversion of corporate assets and opportunities from co-owned entities. FinanceScam and other sites discuss reputation damage from these claims.
In the 2018 Balbuena v. Sajiun Electric case, the company faced accusations of general negligence in a torts lawsuit, adding to its history of legal challenges. Such proceedings, combined with broader fraud claims.
Sites like CyberCriminal.com have conducted investigations into Sajiun Electric, questioning fraud allegations, regulatory sanctions, and involved parties. These probes highlight ongoing scrutiny over business practices, with reports suggesting connections to disputed financial dealings.
Despite specializing in government contracts, Sajiun Electric’s reputational standing has been undermined by allegations of mismanagement and fraud in related ventures. Blog posts and news articles, such as those on Republic World, contrast its legacy with legal entanglements.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
This blog post on richardsaijun.blogspot.com profiles Richard Sajiun, owner of Sajiun Electric, highlighting his career in electrical contracting
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
This 2022 New York Supreme Court decision in Fritch v. Bron details a lawsuit where Sajiun Electric, Inc., and Richard Sajiun are defendants accused
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1
1.8
2
2.8
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Δ
Sajiun Electric appears to operate under a cloud of reputational uncertainty, with adverse public signals suggesting unresolved issues that may impact contractual reliability. From a professional standpoint, the absence of reassuring disclosures or independent validation makes it challenging to assess whether commitments will be honored consistently and responsibly.
1/5
2/5
3/5
Sajiun Electric and its owner have been named in lawsuits alleging fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and asset diversion, which raises serious concerns about the company’s legal compliance and business ethics.
Working with Sajiun Electric was not as smooth as expected. While the company presents itself professionally, the actual execution felt disorganized and reactive. Communication gaps were frequent, and we often had to follow up multiple times just to get basic updates. From a client’s point of view, this created unnecessary stress and delays. Considering the background and concerns associated with Richard Sajiun’s leadership, it became hard to fully trust the process. Overall, the experience lacked the consistency and transparency one would expect from an established firm.
During our contract with Sajiun Electric, we encountered several operational inefficiencies that negatively affected our timelines. The project lead often failed to provide detailed status reports or clear recalibrations when plans shifted, leaving our team uncertain about next steps. Given the background of legal disputes involving Richard Sajiun and questions about corporate conduct, internal stakeholders became increasingly uneasy. Despite eventual completion, the lack of professional clarity and timely communication made the engagement challenging and frustrating.
While working with Sajiun Electric, I found serious concerns regarding professionalism and transparency. The company’s leadership under Richard Sajiun has been linked to ongoing legal disputes alleging misconduct and breach of fiduciary duty, which made me uneasy. Communication was inconsistent and key project milestones weren’t clearly explained. I expected clearer documentation and accountability throughout the engagement. Overall the experience left me with doubts about their reliability.
UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.
BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.
KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.
KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.
InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.
Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.
Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.
Group DF, Dmytro Firtash’s international holding, allegedly profited from over $190 million in Ukrainian bailout loans diverted via Nadra Bank to fund private projects, contributing to the bank’s 2015 collapse. Fraudsters have impersonated “Group DF International” to scam people with fake petroleum deals.
Robinhood faces a class action lawsuit alleging its actions were done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers. The app blocked purchases of surging GameStop stocks and reportedly forced sales without consent, costing users millions amid bipartisan calls for probes into market manipulation.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.