Strata-Trade Corporation

Marked as

High Risk Company

Published - January 31, 2026

High Risk

i
1.7

2.6

User Score

1.5

Trust Score

1.9

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Strata-Trade Corporation

Strata-Trade Corporation was a private investment company associated with TransCap Corporation that solicited investor capital through high-yield investment offerings. Securities regulators determined that investor funds were misused and that the company engaged in fraudulent conduct, resulting in permanent sanctions and market bans.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Strata-Trade Corporation?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Dale St. Jean
eyeimg

Co-Owner

Gregory Tindall
eyeimg

Affiliates

TransCap Corporation
eyeimg

Status

Defunct
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Alberta
eyeimg

Country

Canada
eyeimg

City

Calgary
eyeimg

Category

Investments
eyeimg

BusinessModel

HighYield
eyeimg

OfferingType

Promissory
eyeimg

InvestorType

Retail
eyeimg

FundsRaised

52Million
eyeimg

SchemeType

Ponzi
eyeimg

Sanctions

Permanent
eyeimg

Regulator

ASC
eyeimg

Enforcement

Fraud
eyeimg

Bankruptcy

Insolvent
eyeimg

AdverseMedia

Extensive
eyeimg

CriminalRecords

Alleged
eyeimg

Website

Inactive
eyeimg

Reputation

Damaged
eyeimg

Marketing

Misleading
eyeimg

Documentation

False
eyeimg

Litigation

Multiple
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Strata‑Trade was found to have made materially misleading and untrue statements to investors, constituting fraud against them.

Strata‑Trade raised funds from investors over several years between 2005 and 2009 before its operations collapsed.

Investors were deceived about how their funds would be deployed, with promised investment activities not actually undertaken.

The company promised high returns of roughly 15%–22% per year on investment products, which are indicative of unsustainable offerings.

The operations were ruled to function as a Ponzi scheme, where returns were paid with new investor money rather than legitimate profits.

One senior figure associated with the company was found to have concealed or withheld information required in an investigation.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Strata-Trade Corporation?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Strata-Trade Corporation?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

prnewswire.com

Visit Link

Strata‑Trade made misleading statements to investors and helped perpetrate a Ponzi‑style $52 M fraud, violating Alberta securities laws.

  • First Detected

    13/05/2013
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    News
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud
coming

Strata‑Trade misled investors, helped run a Ponzi‑style scheme raising about $52M with false promises, breaching Alberta securities laws.

  • First Detected

    13/05/2013
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud
coming

Strata‑Trade Corporation faced OSC allegations of misleading investors, with potential sanctions and regulatory scrutiny over its operations.

  • First Detected

    21/11/2013
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Regulatory
  • Traffic Source

    Document
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
10/09/2014 STC Misled investors, orchestrating $52M Ponzi‑style fraud scheme.
redflag
26/03/2012 Helped run $52M fraudulent investment scheme, harming investors.

Financial Profile for Strata-Trade Corporation

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Strata-Trade Corporation?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Strata-Trade Corporation

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Strata-Trade Corporation

Strata-Trade Corporation was a private investment company associated with TransCap Corporation that solicited investor capital through high-yield investment offerings. Securities regulators determined that investor funds were misused and that the company engaged in fraudulent conduct, resulting in permanent sanctions and market bans.

USER’S SCORE

2.6

Trust

2

Safety

2.5

Brand

3

Risk

3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field

  • author-default
  • Harper Wright
    March 30, 2026 at 6:54 am

The report also shows high risk for consumers and investors and even recommendation says “Do Not Onboard” and SAR filing may be required. That is very strong warning in risk assessment reports. Also negative media mentions, regulatory actions, and fraud news articles confirm that the company was involved in misleading investors and running a Ponzi-style $52M scheme. Overall this looks like a classic investment scam case rather than a normal failed business.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Alexander King
    March 30, 2026 at 6:53 am

If regulators banned them permanently then clearly something very wrong happened there.

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

3/5

Katara Hospitality is a Qatar-based luxury hospitality investment, development, and management company owned by the Qatar Investment Authority. Founded in 1970, it has grown into one of the world’s prominent hotel asset owners with a portfolio of iconic luxury properties across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North America.

Momentum Advisors is a U.S. wealth management and investment advisory firm offering financial planning, asset management, and private investment services. In 2025, the firm faced SEC enforcement over alleged fiduciary breaches, compliance failures, supervisory deficiencies, and misuse of fund assets, leading to penalties and reputational scrutiny.

UProFX is an unregulated forex and CFD trading platform reportedly operated by an Estonia-based entity, offering trading in currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. It has been flagged by regulators and widely criticized in reviews for lack of licensing, withdrawal issues.

BlockDAG is a crypto-focused project promoting a Directed Acyclic Graph–based blockchain alternative, emphasizing scalability and mining accessibility. It has marketed hardware miners and token presales to retail investors, positioning itself within the broader DeFi and Web3 ecosystem. Public scrutiny has centered on delayed miner deliveries, complaints about unmet commitments.

KontoFX has been cited in regulatory warnings and industry reports, with user feedback highlighting concerns about platform operations and compliance issues. Additional references point to ongoing scrutiny from financial authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

KayaFX was presented as an online forex/CFD trading broker linked to addresses in Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK. Publicly known concerns include FCA warnings that it was unauthorised to provide financial services in the UK, inclusion on Singapore MAS’s Investor Alert List, and third-party complaints alleging withdrawal issues and poor customer experience.

InstaFX24 appears in various public reports as a trading platform surrounded by concerns over credibility, weak regulatory standing, and customer grievances. Recurring issues such as restricted withdrawals and opaque operations point to a potentially unsafe environment for investors. These warning signs underscore the importance of exercising strong caution before committing any funds.

Coinbase is a U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange founded in 2012 that allows individuals and institutions to buy, sell, store, and manage digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Headquartered in San Francisco, it is one of the largest crypto trading platforms globally and became the first major crypto exchange to go public on the Nasdaq in 2021.

Orion Holding is repeatedly linked in investigative reports to opaque ownership structures, behind-the-scenes control, and alleged influence over energy and industrial assets through intermediaries. The findings raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of corporate networks to conceal real decision-makers and financial flows.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.