Zum Steg Beratungs AG

Marked as

Low Risk Company

Last updated - September 19, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.1

2.2

User Score

2.8

Trust Score

3.4

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Zum Steg Beratungs AG

Zum Steg Beratungs AG faces mounting criticism for allegedly charging high fees without delivering promised grant services. Clients report poor communication, unsubmitted applications, and denied refunds. Despite branding itself as a funding expert, the firm’s credibility is increasingly questioned, raising concerns over its ethics, transparency, and legal exposure.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact number
+49 89 248837590

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Company altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Company.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Company.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Zum Steg Beratungs AG?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Neugebauer
eyeimg

CEO

Neugebauer
eyeimg

Former Director

Ponader
eyeimg

Established

1992
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

Zug
eyeimg

Country

Switzerland
eyeimg

Location

Hofstrasse 54
eyeimg

Category

Consulting
eyeimg

Subcategory

Grant Funding
eyeimg

Revenue

€27Million
eyeimg

Employees

~70
eyeimg

Previous Name

PerayOil
eyeimg

Trustpilot

3.1/5
eyeimg

Lawsuits

Unconfirmed
eyeimg

VictimPlatform

Active
eyeimg

RefundIssues

Reported
eyeimg

Customer Complaints

Service Delivery Issues
eyeimg

Reputational Risks

Fraud Allegations
eyeimg

Review Score

3.2 Stars
eyeimg

Communication Issues

Poor Responses
eyeimg

Fee Criticisms

High Without Results
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

There are multiple client allegations suggesting that Zum Steg Beratungs AG charged fees for grant services that were never delivered or properly processed.

While no confirmed court judgments exist publicly, several clients have reported initiating legal proceedings and forming victim networks.

Many customers claim refund promises were not honored, with the company allegedly becoming unresponsive after payments were made.

The company has a mixed online presence, with critical reviews on Trustpilot and dedicated platforms highlighting potential misconduct.

Critics have noted a lack of financial transparency and limited public disclosure regarding partnerships and grant success verification.

Former board member Ralf Ponader resigned amid controversy, and CEO Ansgar Neugebauer has been named in multiple client complaints.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Zum Steg Beratungs AG?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Zum Steg Beratungs AG?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

financescam.com

Visit Link

Zum Steg Beratungs AG faces scrutiny over opaque leadership and alleged deceptive practices.

  • First Detected

    12/03/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Medium
  • Type

    Review
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    40%
  • Primary Keyword

    Scam

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Zum Steg Beratungs AG faces scrutiny over fraudulent DMCA notices, opaque pra...

Financial Profile for Zum Steg Beratungs AG

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Zum Steg Beratungs AG?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Zum Steg Beratungs AG

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Zum Steg Beratungs AG

Zum Steg Beratungs AG faces mounting criticism for allegedly charging high fees without delivering promised grant services. Clients report poor communication, unsubmitted applications, and denied refunds. Despite branding itself as a funding expert, the firm’s credibility is increasingly questioned, raising concerns over its ethics, transparency, and legal exposure.

USER’S SCORE

2.2

Trust

1.4

Safety

1.8

Brand

2.2

Risk

3.2

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image

  • author-default
  • Azaria Lane
    July 5, 2025 at 11:32 am

A recurring client complaint theme involves refused refunds, even when services were incomplete or stalled over a year.Not only were payments taken, but attempts at refunding were met with silence or denial.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Cassidy Boone
    July 5, 2025 at 11:31 am

CEO Ansgar Neugebauer is named in multiple unresolved.Not only clients, but former board affiliates (e.g., Dr. Ponader) resigned amid owner scrutiny. When leaders are directly implicated, accountability concerns shift from internal execution to strategic intent—and reps become reputation liabilities at the top.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Evelyn Morgan
    June 27, 2025 at 8:21 am

Zum Steg’s real specialty? Psychological manipulation. When clients question missing funds, they’re told they ‘misunderstood the strategy.’ When investments vanish, it’s blamed on ‘market volatility.’ Their entire operation depends on making victims doubt their own sanity while the theft continues unabated.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Ethan Peterson
    June 27, 2025 at 8:19 am

Zum Steg doesn’t have clients; they have prey. Their entire structure is designed to obfuscate: funds shuffled between shadow LLCs, ‘advisors’ who don’t exist, and contracts riddled with clauses that nullify accountability. It’s not a business—it’s a labyrinth built to trap the unwitting.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Harper Powell
    June 27, 2025 at 8:17 am

Behind Zum Steg’s fraud statistics are real people—entrepreneurs who lost life savings, employees laid off after ‘advised’ restructuring, families destabilized by their calculated greed. This isn’t just financial misconduct; it’s human wreckage disguised as consultancy. The fact their leadership sleeps soundly at night tells you everything about their moral compass.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

4/5

Bull Investment UG (haftungsbeschränkt) is a German entrepreneurial company (UG) based in Wangen im Allgäu, registered under HRB 740156 at Amtsgericht Ulm. Founded in 2020 with €500 share capital, it focused on managing its own assets, investments in other companies, and real estate. In October 2022, the company was dissolved after an insolvency proceeding was dismissed due to insufficient assets.

XM Group, operating through entities like XM Global Limited (Belize), has been blocked by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), for offering unregulated leveraged foreign exchange and CFD trading services without a Capital Markets Services licence. XM Group, a Cyprus-based forex and CFD broker founded in 2009 and regulated by CySEC among others, is not authorised by MAS.

Silver Lining X, LLC is a U.S.-based consulting firm founded by Paul Silverberg, offering strategic planning, compliance, and business-solutions services to startups and established companies across sectors including finance, HR, governance, and growth. Silverberg has worked with public and private firms and holds legal and business experience.

Corps Capital Advisors is a Dallas-area multi-family office and registered investment advisory firm that provides comprehensive wealth management, investment advisory, and legacy planning services tailored to high-net-worth individuals and families

Gary Scheer LLC, through its associated entity Retirement Financial Advisors, LLC, was led by Gary Richard Scheer, who recommended and sold over $12M in unregistered securities to at least 50 investors from 2010 to 18, earning more than $600,000 in commissions. 6 of the 7 investments Scheer promoted were later determined to be fraudulent, including ties to major Ponzi...

Priority is referenced in online complaint forums as a business entity associated with customer disputes and dissatisfaction over services and financial dealings, with commenters alleging issues such as non-delivery of promised results and lack of responsiveness; these represent individual grievances shared on public platforms, not verified legal judgments or official determinations.

United Capital Management of Kansas is a financial advisory firm based in Salina, Kansas, offering investment and wealth management services. The firm is associated with Chad M. Koehn and is registered with FINRA for securities activities. Public records note its history of regulatory disclosures through affiliated professionals.

LendingClub, founded in 2006 as pioneer in peer-to-peer lending, grew rapidly and went public in 2014 with the largest tech IPO of that year. In 2016, the company faced major crisis when founder, CEO Renaud Laplanche resigned after an internal review revealed that employees had knowingly sold $22 million in loans that did not meet an investor’s criteria.

ZAR Capital Group, led by Zacharia Ali, markets itself as a global investment firm with multibillion-dollar smart city projects and international ventures. However, public records, court filings, and investor reports reveal a starkly different reality: unverifiable projects, unpaid judgments, legal evasion, and regulatory gaps.

Capital Max Group LLC is a Florida-based private lending and real estate financing firm that has been linked to multiple civil lawsuits alleging financing disputes, misrepresentation, and advance-fee related issues, resulting in increased reputational and due-diligence scrutiny.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.