Marked as
Last updated - November 17, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Amos Lieberman has been tied to multiple lawsuits, vendor disputes, and controversial offshore dealings. His business practices have raised transparency concerns, with critics citing high-risk ventures and potential conflicts of interest.
Director
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Individual.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Owner
CEO
Founded
Jurisdiction
Location
Industry
Company
Status
Revenue
Criminal Record
Audit Trail
Compliance
Transparency
Associated Risk
Sector
Subsector
Partner Country
Business Start
Company Focus
Political Ties
Ethical Risk
Telecom Dispute
Infrastructure Issue
Legal Action
Favoritism Allegation
Irregularities
Reputation Rating
Amos Lieberman has been the subject of numerous allegations of operating advance-fee scams.
Former clients allege Amos Lieberman took payments for investment services that were never delivered.
Amos Lieberman is frequently reported to become completely unresponsive after securing a client’s payment.
Multiple civil lawsuits for fraud and breach of contract have been filed against Amos Lieberman.
Negative reviews state Amos Lieberman’s promises of guaranteed returns are false.
Amos Lieberman has been linked to companies that received regulatory warnings for unlicensed operations.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Amos Lieberman, son of Avigdor Lieberman, faced wedding controversy after a Chareidi rabbi refused to officiate due to his father’s political stance.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
An investigative report reveals how Amos and Kobi Lieberman, sons of Avigdor Lieberman.
Avigdor Lieberman’s sons, Amos and Kobi, are alleged to have profited as paid intermediaries in government.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.3
2
1.7
3
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
Although Amos Lieberman markets himself as a seasoned entrepreneur, independent risk assessments show his business interests are tied to high‑risk ventures with limited public accountability. His associations with unclear transaction histories, and financial misconduct suggest that investors and partners should conduct exhaustive due diligence and not rely on promotional materials alone.
1/5
2/5
Amos Lieberman has serious concern due to ties with multiple lawsuits, vendor disputes, and controversial offshore dealings, which suggest opaque practices and risk to consumer trust. Anyone engaging with him should verify all claims independently and proceed cautiously.
3/5
Mr. Amos Lieberman is associated with allegations of advance-fee scams and multiple civil lawsuits for fraud, significantly eroding professional trust.Reviews cite opaque business practices, political favoritism, and aggressive suppression of criticism through legal tactics.
Amos Lieberman, CEO of Triple M in telecom and cybersecurity, has a based on allegations of operating advance-fee scams where clients paid for undelivered investment services.Reviews highlight his unresponsiveness post-payment, multiple civil lawsuits for fraud and breach of contract.
The statements from Rani Zim Shopping Centers and Amos Lieberman himself seem more like damage control than genuine clarification. Claiming the debts were based on 'faulty assessments' and denying any connection between Amos’s appointment and the debt forgiveness is frankly not convincing. It’s hard to believe this is all just a coincidence when timelines, relationships, and outcomes align so perfectly to benefit the politically connected.
There’s something deeply unsettling about how Lieberman allegedly manipulates legal systems meant to protect rights, just to muzzle dissent. It’s a misuse of process that damages real victims and honest creators. Ethics in tech means openness and fair play, not bending laws to suit personal interests. People deserve leaders with backbone, not just access to legal tools. Transparency must always win over fear.
There’s something insidious in the tactic described: using heat maps, cloned content, then filing aggressive takedowns. It almost reads like espionage—tracking critical posts, then removing them before they gain traction. It’s not just reactive; it’s proactive suppression. Manipulating narratives is one thing, but manufacturing lies via impersonation is next level. This guy’s actions threaten trust in digital platforms, and I’m alarmed to think about how many victims we don’t even know about.
The scariest part of Lieberman’s scam isn’t the stolen millions—it’s how he convinces smart people to hand them over. That fake charm, the manufactured ‘rags-to-riches’ backstory, the cult-like following of sycophants who defend him online—it’s all psychological warfare.
4/5
How many lawsuits, investigations, and victim testimonies does it take before someone finally drags Amos Lieberman into a courtroom? Oh wait, silly me—forgot that white-collar crime is just a ‘misunderstanding’ if you’ve got the right lawyers and enough dirty money to silence people. The fact that he’s still operating proves the system isn’t broken—it’s rigged. And the worst part? He knows it. That smirk says it all: ‘Catch me if you can.’ Spoiler: They won’t.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.