Andrii Bruika

Marked as

Medium Risk Individual

Last updated - December 11, 2025

Medium Risk

i
2.5

2

User Score

2.4

Trust Score

2.6

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Andrii Bruika

Andrii Bruika is associated with high-risk fintech and payment service operations, including roles linked to platforms mentioned in industry watchdog reports. Public sources reference his involvement with companies flagged for regulatory concerns, disputed business practices, and alleged participation in questionable payment networks, contributing to reputational risk.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Individual.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Andrii Bruika?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Director

Andrii Bruika
eyeimg

Company

AnyMoney
eyeimg

Exposure

Elevated
eyeimg

Category

Fintech
eyeimg

Sector

Payments
eyeimg

Transparency

Low
eyeimg

Operations

Crossborder
eyeimg

Footprint

Digital
eyeimg

RiskLevel

High
eyeimg

Visibility

Medium
eyeimg

IndustryRisk

High
eyeimg

RedFlags

Multiple
eyeimg

MediaCoverage

Negative
eyeimg

Network

PSP
eyeimg

ComplianceRisk

Significant
eyeimg

Publicity

Sparse
eyeimg

Oversight

Limited
eyeimg

Monitoring

Required
eyeimg

Stability

Uncertain
eyeimg

Influence

Moderate
eyeimg

Vulnerability

High
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

AnyCach OÜ surrendered its Estonian crypto license in 2020 due to AML deficiencies. The license was formally revoked in 2021 after exposure as a payment channel for investment scams.

Andrii Bruika concealed connections to Alessandro Rocco Pietrocola and Artem Kutsyi. These individuals later appeared as owners or directors of successor payment entities such as DBR Security Ltd.

FinTelegram and watchdog outlets describe him as a hidden puppet master behind broker scam payments. His platforms are accused of enabling boiler-room fraud and contributing to multi-billion-dollar illicit crypto flows.

Multiple breach-of-contract claims were filed in UK courts against Anymoney Ltd. Andrii Bruika was named in discovery, though cases reportedly settled out of court with limited public record.

Multiple breach-of-contract actions were brought against Anymoney Ltd in UK courts. Andrii Bruika appeared in discovery documents, with most cases reportedly settled privately.

NonBank.io and JCash share addresses, personnel, and infrastructure with the former Any.Money network. They exhibit weak KYC controls, proliferation-financing risks, and behavioral patterns associated with planned exit scams.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Andrii Bruika?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Andrii Bruika?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

fintelegram.com

Visit Link

FinTelegram tag page raising warnings about Andrii Bruika’s alleged role in facilitating high-risk payment networks and fraud-linked transactions.

  • First Detected

    01/05/2022
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud
coming

financescam.com

Visit Link

Andrii Bruika as a manipulator allegedly driving harmful financial scams and exploiting victims through deceitful schemes.

  • First Detected

    17/12/2024
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Criticism
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Scam

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Andrii Bruika Financial Technology and Fraud Risks

Financial Profile for Andrii Bruika

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Andrii Bruika?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Andrii Bruika

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Andrii Bruika

Andrii Bruika is associated with high-risk fintech and payment service operations, including roles linked to platforms mentioned in industry watchdog reports. Public sources reference his involvement with companies flagged for regulatory concerns, disputed business practices, and alleged participation in questionable payment networks, contributing to reputational risk.

USER’S SCORE

2

Trust

1.6

Safety

2

Brand

1.4

Risk

2.8

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video

  • author-default
  • Connor Whitshaw
    January 28, 2026 at 6:58 am

I’ve had experiences where risky approaches have led to problems, and I see similar patterns here.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Beatrice Hollister
    January 28, 2026 at 6:57 am

I would be cautious working with someone linked to questionable payment networks.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Isabella Moore
    December 27, 2025 at 10:08 am

Honestly, reading about Andrii Bruika made me worried as a consumer. What stands out is not his expertise but how much uncertainty there is about what he actually does. A professional should have a clear track record — and sadly, that’s missing here. Given the circumstances, I’d be very careful and demand proof of real, legitimate activity if anyone were to consider working with him.

Trust

2/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Benjamin Scott
    December 27, 2025 at 10:00 am

Here’s my straight take: Andrii Bruika’s name appears mostly in risk reporting, not in trusted business circles. As someone who follows fintech developments, I find the lack of credible, positive information striking. Profiles that lean heavily into “medium risk” without much context make me think twice about trusting that individual. If others are thinking of engaging with him, I’d urge caution until verifiable, transparent details become available.

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Amelia King
    December 27, 2025 at 9:58 am

After reading about Andrii Bruika, I’m conflicted. On one hand, he’s listed as involved in fintech and digital payments, which can be legitimate sectors. On the other hand, many reports mention high-risk associations and disputed practices, and there’s almost no clear info about his background or credentials. That lack of transparency really bothers me and makes him seem like someone worth avoiding until more solid proof of legitimacy shows up.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.

Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.

Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”

Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.

Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.

Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.

John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.

Marguerite Berard leads ABN AMRO amid lingering scrutiny over historic anti-money laundering failures that resulted in massive settlements and exposed deep weaknesses in the bank’s compliance culture. Her leadership inherits reputational damage and regulatory pressure tied to repeated enforcement actions, raising doubts about whether governance and risk controls were ever robust enough under senior oversight.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.