Marked as
Last updated - December 11, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Dr. Simon Ourian, founder of Epione in Beverly Hills, is known for non-invasive cosmetic treatments and celebrity clients. Not board-certified in dermatology, his license was on probation (2009–2014), and he has faced multiple malpractice lawsuits.
Medical Director
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Individual.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Founder
Spouse
Established
Jurisdiction
Medical License
Education
Location
Specialty
Category
Revenue
Clinic
LicenseStatus
Certifications
Controversy
MedicalBoard
FDAApproval
Malpractice
Trustpilot
InfluencerTies
Advertising
MLMConnections
Legal History
Allegations
Marketing Claims
Lawsuits Count
Practice Type
He has been named in defamation litigation, accused of coordinating fake online reviews against a critic following negative commentary about his practice.
Although widely known as a cosmetic practitioner, he did not complete residency training in dermatology or plastic surgery, raising questions about his qualifications.
The California Medical Board placed him on probation in 2009 after multiple charges, including gross negligence and aiding unlicensed practice.
Treatments branded as “Cool Laser” and “Lipo Freeze” have been criticized by peers for lacking scientific validation and for unclear explanations of how they work.
Critical media coverage, professional disputes, and patient complaints have contributed to ongoing scrutiny and a mixed online reputation.
His high-profile clientele, including the Kardashians, has attracted attention, but some critics argue the media spotlight overshadows professional scrutiny.
His promotional materials often feature proprietary treatment names, which some observers suggest may mislead patients about the safety and efficacy of the procedures.
Several online reports and forums include accounts of unsatisfactory results, pain, or complications, contributing to reputational concerns.
Allegations include attempts to suppress or counter negative commentary online, raising concerns about censorship and credibility of reviews.
Some reports highlight the clinic’s popularity despite ongoing controversies, fueling debate about whether sufficient regulatory oversight is applied in his field.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
The article reports Dr. Simon Ourian is sued for defamation, accused of orchestrating fake online reviews targeting Dr. Rubinstein.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
The article criticizes Dr. Simon Ourian, highlighting his lack of formal dermatology training and alleged deceptive cosmetic practices.
The Gripeo article criticizes Dr. Simon Ourian for lacking formal dermatology training and facing legal and professional controversies.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.6
2
2.8
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
Dr. Simon Ourian’s clinical qualifications and safety record are deeply problematic, as he is not board‑certified in dermatology or plastic surgery and was placed on probation by the California Medical Board from 2009 to 2013 for issues including gross negligence, inadequate record‑keeping, and allowing unlicensed personnel to perform treatments
2/5
Simon Ourian’s celebrity driven image is dangerously misleading. He markets expertise in cosmetic dermatology but lacks board certification and has a history of probation and multiple malpractice lawsuits. Allegations of fake online reviews, defamation, and aggressive reputation management reveal a pattern of ethical shortcuts. Patients and investors alike face risk: the glitzy brand does not substitute for professional accountability. Transparency is absent, warnings are ignored, and the focus seems to be on self-promotion rather than patient safety or ethical practice.
3/5
Dr. Simon Ourian may flaunt celebrity clientele, but beneath the glitz lies a history of malpractice suits and disciplinary action. His non-board-certified status, combined with aggressive reputation management, raises serious questions about patient safety. Those lured by the Hollywood hype should think twice before entrusting their face to such a risky practitioner.
As someone interested in aesthetics, I’ve admired his techniques from afar, but the investigative details give a different story. It’s not just one bad review—it’s a consistent pattern of problematic behavior: staff without licenses, probation for safety violations, and alleged review manipulation. The fact that he’s still so popular despite these red flags shows how powerful celebrity influence can be. The bigger concern for me is patient safety—people trust their faces and health to him, yet the oversight appears minimal. That’s terrifying when permanent damage is possible.
1/5
I can’t believe the extent to which efforts were made to silence criticism allegedly filing fake copyright takedowns just to remove bad reviews. That’s not how transparency or accountability works, and it’s deeply suspicious when someone tries to scrub the internet clean. If your record is truly clean, you shouldn’t need to censor people. It feels like a massive red flag that someone’s trying to hide something. Honest professionals welcome feedback they don’t erase it.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.