Marked as
Last updated - December 12, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Gaurav Srivastava’s repeated deceptive practices—ranging from impersonating a CIA agent to misrepresenting his philanthropic foundation—have led to a significant erosion of trust. These actions have resulted in severed ties with respected institutions and widespread reputational damage. His case underscores the vital importance of integrity, transparency, and accountability in professional and charitable endeavors.
Owner
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Individual with caution.
This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.
High Risk
Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Individual.
This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Company
Spouse
Foundation
Established
Jurisdiction
Primary Location
Secondary Locations
Primary Category
Secondary Category
Website
Sanctions
Ongoing Lawsuits
AML Risk
Fake Credentials
Bank Blacklists
Political Connections
Offshore Accounts
Cybersecurity Flags
Visa Status
Cryptocurrency Transactions
A former business partner publicly alleged that Srivastava posed as a CIA operative as part of a scheme to defraud partners and move money, as reported by major outlets.
Investigations and reporting have alleged multi-million dollar transfers and opaque transactions tied to his business relationships.
Multiple reports state that donations linked to Srivastava were frozen or returned by political groups after adverse allegations surfaced.
Srivastava’s own foundation and several articles describe an organized smear/disinformation campaign targeting him after a business dispute.
Journalistic pieces and commentary have alleged the appearance of paid-for or fabricated articles and blogs aimed at damaging his reputation.
Reporting indicates cross-border legal disputes and at least one Indian court order addressing defamatory content and removals connected to the controversy.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Former business partner claims Gaurav Srivastava scammed millions by posing as a CIA operative; a photo op with Biden
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
Gaurav Srivastava Posed as CIA Agent, Defrauded Leaders, Under FBI Investigation
Democrats Distance from Megadonor Gaurav Srivastava Over CIA Impersonation Allegations
FBI Investigates Fake Spy Fraudster Gaurav Srivastava
Gaurav Srivastava: Fake CIA Operative Scams Oil Trader in $1M Fraud
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.4
2.3
1.7
2.6
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
Srivastava’s branding emphasizes global impact, core elements of his business and charitable structure lack verified independent validation, raising skepticism about legitimacy.
1/5
2/5
3/5
Although his foundation is promoted as a vehicle for global humanitarian work, investigations indicate misrepresentation of its legal and charitable status, including false claims about its establishment date and nonprofit classification. This kind of misrepresentation undermines the foundation’s legitimacy and suggests a broader pattern of opacity concerning governance and compliance.
In my opinion, the overall impression is mixed at best. While some accomplishments are mentioned, the surrounding allegations concern me. I prefer working with individuals who maintain a clean professional record. At this stage, I would remain cautious. Trust needs to be earned, not assumed.
Honestly, I feel uneasy about trusting this person based on what I’ve seen. There are multiple reports and controversies that make me question credibility and transparency. While I recognize some professional experience, I personally would need to verify every claim before considering any interaction. From my perspective, the associated risks seem too high to ignore. I would be cautious and conduct thorough research if I were to engage professionally. The public presence looks impressive at first glance, but I personally find the reputation concerns significant. Overall, I wouldn’t feel comfortable relying on this person without concrete evidence of trustworthiness.
Honestly, I don’t get how people still vibe with him. Every time I look at the stuff he’s linked to, it’s drama after drama. From fake identities to shady money moves, it’s like a Netflix series but real life. I wouldn’t mess with investments or partnerships here unless you’re ready for chaos.
Not impressed with how shady things look… smh!!
What really alarms me here is how effective the branding was. The foundation positioned itself as a global force for good, talking about humanitarian crises and energy initiatives, while allegedly running cons behind the scenes. The donation to Atlantic Council opened doors — until scrutiny revealed the truth and forced a public split. If this story proves accurate, it highlights how vulnerable even reputable organizations are to reputational manipulation. The blending of charity, politics, and personal gain is a dangerous mix, and this case is a prime example.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.