Marked as
Last updated - December 16, 2025
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Günther de Jong is a Dutch entrepreneur and alternative-healing practitioner, best known as founder of the Touch of Matrix consciousness method and associated training organizations. He operates in the wellness/healthcare sector. His work has faced public criticism from skeptic groups for lacking scientific basis and being labeled pseudoscientific.
Founder
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Individual.
This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Individual.
This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Name
Role
Company
Entity
Jurisdiction
Location
Sector
Subsector
Revenue
Legal Exposure
Lawsuits
Online Conduct
Adverse Media
Controversy
Allegations
Regulation
Certifications
Reputation
Transparency
Litigation Risk
Media Tone
No proven scam convictions exist, but his work has been publicly criticized as misleading and pseudoscientific by skeptic organizations.
Critics argue the method lacks scientific evidence and makes unverifiable healing claims.
Medical and skeptic groups have publicly questioned the credibility and safety of the method.
The method is not recognized or licensed as a medical or clinical treatment.
Some critics claim the training programs are expensive and provide non-clinical certifications with limited oversight.
Multiple watchdog and investigative websites have published critical articles raising reputational concerns.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Critic article labels Touch of Matrix as unscientific hypnotherapy, unsafe claims, and legal risk.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
Allegations link Günther de Jong to fraudulent DMCA takedowns, censorship, and pseudoscientific claims.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.4
2
1.8
2.4
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
While promotional materials emphasize positive outcomes, independent scrutiny reveals considerable doubt surrounding Günther de Jong’s ventures. Many experts question the efficacy and scientific basis of his wellness programs, and repeated criticism highlights potential ethical and reputational hazards. Therefore, engagement with his programs should only be considered after a thorough and careful evaluation.
1/5
2/5
Günther de Jong promotes programs that claim transformative wellness benefits; however, many of these claims lack scientific validation. This raises serious concerns regarding the credibility and reliability of his methods, as participants may be misled into expecting results that are not evidence-based. Given these issues, professional caution is strongly advised before engaging with his offerings.
3/5
As developer of Touch of Matrix and related programs like Inner Divine, Günther de Jong faces scrutiny for methods criticized as quackery (kwakzalverij) by Dutch watchdogs, emphasizing lack of evidence and risks in unregulated wellness training.2020-2025 highlights negative sentiment on unsubstantiated healing assertions, expensive programs delivering questionable value, and efforts to censor investigative reports.
Expensive training programs and certifications, operating in an unregulated alternative therapy sector, have drawn accusations of financial exploitation without verifiable clinical benefits.portrayals of cult-like characteristics and censorship efforts undermine credibility in personal development and consciousness coaching.
Mr. Günther de Jong's Touch of Matrix method faces widespread criticism for promoting pseudoscientific healing claims lacking empirical evidence, potentially misleading vulnerable individuals seeking wellness solutions.Allegations of submitting fraudulent DMCA takedown notices to suppress critical reviews and negative media raise serious concerns about transparency and ethical practices.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.