Last updated - December 16, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.0

1.8

User Score

2.9

Trust Score

3.1

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Jason Kow

January 2021, Queensgate Investments LLP, led by CEO Jason Kow, lost a bid to keep an employment tribunal private, revealing allegations by former executive Jonathan Millet of fraud through misattributing costs to inflate fees and a toxic workplace involving racism, anti-Semitism, and other bigotry. Days later, the parties settled the lawsuit out of court with no admission of liability.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

LinkedIn
Jason Kow

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

High Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend that employees exercise extreme caution or reconsider association with this Individual.

This advisory stems from an aggregate risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

You are likely to face significant risks by pursuing or maintaining employment with this entity.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Individual.

This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Jason Kow?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Full Name

Jason Hann Jeic Kow
eyeimg

Date of Birth

April 16, 1980
eyeimg

Birth Country

Australia
eyeimg

Moved to UK Age

10
eyeimg

Nationality

British
eyeimg

University

Oxford
eyeimg

Degree

Economics Management
eyeimg

Current Company

Queensgate Investments
eyeimg

Current Title

CEO
eyeimg

Founded Year

2011
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

UK
eyeimg

Location

London
eyeimg

Category

Real Estate
eyeimg

Subcategory

Private Equity
eyeimg

Assets Managed

£3 Billion
eyeimg

Previous Role 1

Head Special Situations
eyeimg

Previous Company 1

London & Regional
eyeimg

Previous Role 2

Head Real Estate
eyeimg

Previous Company 2

SPQR Capital
eyeimg

Previous Role 3

Private Equity
eyeimg

Previous Company 3

Credit Suisse
eyeimg

Deal

Grange Hotels
eyeimg

Deal Amount

£1 Billion
eyeimg

Deal Year

2019
eyeimg

Partner 1

Kow Family
eyeimg

Partner 2

Alvarium Investments
eyeimg

Partner 3

Peterson Group
eyeimg

Charity 1

Avonmore School
eyeimg

Lawsuit

Fraud Claims
eyeimg

Ruling

Lost Privacy
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Former executive Jonathan Millet accused Jason Kow of insisting on misattributing the firm’s entire cost base to a single investment, inflating fees and misleading investors and lenders in a 2021 employment tribunal case that was later settled.

Jason Kow’s firm faced public scrutiny after losing a bid to keep private a lawsuit alleging racism and anti-Semitism by Millet, portraying a toxic workplace culture during his tenure as CEO. The exposure amplified negative media coverage.

Jason Kow and Queensgate sought to anonymize the racism and fraud proceedings, but the UK Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled against it in 2021, highlighting efforts to evade accountability. This perceived censorship attempt fueled perceptions of opacity.

The 2021 settlement of Millet’s claims against Jason Kow did not include admissions of guilt, but lingering reports of fraud and discrimination continue to shadow his professional profile in investment circles. Investors may view this as a unresolved risk.

Media outlets have depicted Jason Kow as central to a scandal involving fraudulent fee practices and bigotry at Queensgate, based on Millet’s testimony about directives from the CEO. Such coverage has potentially eroded trust among stakeholders in the £3B asset management firm.

Allegations against Jason Kow include directing the inflation of investment fees through cost misallocation, as claimed in the public tribunal documents from the Queensgate case. This has branded him with a narrative of ethical lapses in private equity operations.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Jason Kow?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Jason Kow?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Bloomberg.com

Visit Link

The Bloomberg article reports on Queensgate Investments LLP, under CEO Jason Kow, losing a UK High Court bid to conduct a lawsuit in private.

  • First Detected

    20/01/2021
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Negative
  • Reach

    >1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 10
  • Share of Voice

    20%
  • Primary Keyword

    Lawsuit

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2021 London Private Equity Fund Loses Ruling on Racism, Fraud Claims

Financial Profile for Jason Kow

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Jason Kow?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Jason Kow

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Jason Kow

January 2021, Queensgate Investments LLP, led by CEO Jason Kow, lost a bid to keep an employment tribunal private, revealing allegations by former executive Jonathan Millet of fraud through misattributing costs to inflate fees and a toxic workplace involving racism, anti-Semitism, and other bigotry. Days later, the parties settled the lawsuit out of court with no admission of liability.

USER’S SCORE

1.8

Trust

1

Safety

1.4

Brand

2

Risk

2.8

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field

  • author-default
  • Leon Bauer
    January 29, 2026 at 6:34 am

Jason Kow, investor, presents opportunities that may seem promising but carry significant hidden risks. Some decisions lack transparency and ethical clarity. Extreme caution is recommended, and trust should not be given lightly. His approach can jeopardize outcomes.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Pieter de Vries
    January 29, 2026 at 6:32 am

While presentations of success may seem polished, underlying conduct has drawn criticism for opaque practices and questionable decision‑making that could harm stakeholders. Such patterns undermine trust and confidence

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Hannah Moore
    January 5, 2026 at 5:11 am

Professional conduct associated with him shows recurring concerns around transparency and ethical oversight. Allegations regarding workplace behavior and financial practices indicate possible lapses in governance. The resolution of disputes often lacks clarity, leaving stakeholders uncertain. Such patterns can significantly undermine trust and credibility.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Andrew Thomas
    January 5, 2026 at 5:09 am

Jason Kow’s record has drawn scrutiny due to repeated disputes involving management practices. The lack of transparent resolution raises concerns about decision-making ethics. Such matters can impact organizational morale. They also pose reputational challenges externally.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Isabella Taylor
    January 5, 2026 at 5:08 am

There are serious concerns regarding ethical conduct, as a former executive alleged that financial figures may have been misrepresented to inflate fees, which raises questions about transparency and fiduciary responsibility.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

David Perez is the Co-Founder and CEO of iVisa, a travel documentation platform focused on simplifying visa and travel permit applications. While the company has expanded globally, it has faced recurring customer concerns regarding processing delays, communication, and service reliability, which may impact overall customer satisfaction and brand perception.

Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).

John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.

Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.

Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”

Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.

Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.

Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.