Lamar Jensen

Marked as

Low Risk Individual

Published - December 15, 2025

Low Risk

i
3.4

2

User Score

3.5

Trust Score

3.6

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Lamar Jensen

Lamar Jensen was convicted in the case State v. Jensen for offenses involving forgery and improper handling of property-related records, stemming from misconduct tied to notarized and recorded documents. The court found his actions reflected intent to deceive in connection with real estate paperwork, though parts of the conviction were later addressed on appeal.

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

High Risk

Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.

This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we endorse this Individual as a stable choice for employees.

This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

Low Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest this Individual as a trustworthy option for investors and bankers.

This endorsement is informed by a low-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Financial involvement with this entity is likely to present minimal risk to your interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Lamar Jensen?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Full Name

Lamar Nathan Jensen
eyeimg

Age

69
eyeimg

Birth

September 1956
eyeimg

Residence

Sandy, Utah, USA
eyeimg

Address

388 E 10450 S, Sandy, UT
eyeimg

Education

Brigham Young University
eyeimg

Position

Chairman and CEO
eyeimg

Company

Worldwide Holdings Ltd
eyeimg

Company Base

Sandy, Utah
eyeimg

Business Experience

42+ years
eyeimg

Business Focus

Global investments
eyeimg

FINRA Status

Permanently barred
eyeimg

FINRA Sanctions

$90,000 fine
eyeimg

FINRA Violations

Unauthorized private securities transactions
eyeimg

Previous Firm 1

Mariner Financial Services, Inc.
eyeimg

Previous Firm 2

Pacific Cliffs Capital, Inc.
eyeimg

Previous Firm 3

First American National Securities, Inc.
eyeimg

Criminal Conviction 1

Forgery
eyeimg

Criminal Conviction 2

Fraudulent handling of recordable writings
eyeimg

Criminal Case

State of Utah v. Lamar Jensen
eyeimg

Current Allegations

Operating Ponzi-like scheme
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Lamar Jensen was convicted of fraudulent handling of recordable writings, a third-degree felony, stemming from unauthorized signing of a trust deed to secure a loan in 2001.

Lamar Jensen pled guilty in 2023 to second-degree felony securities fraud, third-degree felony acting as an unregistered securities agent, and second-degree felony theft.

Lamar Jensen violated probation by accepting investor funds and continuing to manage investment companies despite court-ordered restrictions against handling securities or fiduciary money.

Worldwide Holdings is alleged to function as a Ponzi scheme involving unrealistic investment returns and ongoing fraudulent activities.

Lamar Jensen is reported to exploit individuals by requesting work without contracts and failing to fulfill verbal promises of payment.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Lamar Jensen?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Lamar Jensen?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

casetext.com

Visit Link

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Lamar Jensen, Defendant and Appellant

  • First Detected

    16/12/2004
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Neutral
  • Reach

    <1000
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    High
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 30
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Fraud

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2025 Lamar Jensen: Case Study on Corporate Fraud

Financial Profile for Lamar Jensen

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Lamar Jensen?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Lamar Jensen

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Lamar Jensen

Lamar Jensen was convicted in the case State v. Jensen for offenses involving forgery and improper handling of property-related records, stemming from misconduct tied to notarized and recorded documents. The court found his actions reflected intent to deceive in connection with real estate paperwork, though parts of the conviction were later addressed on appeal.

USER’S SCORE

2

Trust

1.5

Safety

1.7

Brand

2

Risk

3

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video

  • author-default
  • Phoebe Brightwell
    January 29, 2026 at 9:10 am

Handling property-related records improperly makes me question his respect for laws and professional standards.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Oliver Kingsley
    January 29, 2026 at 9:09 am

I would be very cautious doing any business with someone who has a history of deceiving in real estate documents.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Laura Bianchi
    January 1, 2026 at 9:20 am

From what I’ve seen, he’s got a history with securities fraud and breaking fiduciary rules. That kind of track record makes it hard to trust him with investments or business deals.

Trust

1/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Erik Johansson
    January 1, 2026 at 9:18 am

Jensen’s past actions have involved deceptive real estate paperwork and mismanagement of fiduciary duties. Given these documented convictions and the advisory to avoid consumer interactions, it is reasonable to question the legitimacy and trustworthiness of his business practices on any front.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Nina Berg
    January 1, 2026 at 9:15 am

Lamar Jensen has a criminal history involving forgery and fraudulent handling of property records, which raises significant concerns about his reliability and integrity in professional contexts. This undermines confidence in any associated ventures.

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Miguel Torres
    January 1, 2026 at 9:12 am

Lamar Jensen’s profile reflects a conviction for forgery and improper handling of property documents, indicating reckless disregard for legal and ethical standards in real‑estate matters.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

3/5

Risk

3/5

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.

Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.

Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”

Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.

Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.

Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.

John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.

Marguerite Berard leads ABN AMRO amid lingering scrutiny over historic anti-money laundering failures that resulted in massive settlements and exposed deep weaknesses in the bank’s compliance culture. Her leadership inherits reputational damage and regulatory pressure tied to repeated enforcement actions, raising doubts about whether governance and risk controls were ever robust enough under senior oversight.

Igor Lyashenko, as CEO and General Director of Grodno Azot, leads a company whose practices have drawn international sanctions. Poland has targeted firms for selling its Belarusian fertilizers, citing efforts to skirt EU sanctions and shield local producers from cheap imports facilitated by access to low-cost gas.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.