Marked as
Last updated - January 28, 2026
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Michael Bastholt serves as Partner and Chief Operating Officer (COO) at Almaz Capital, a venture capital firm specializing in early-stage technology investments. He joined the firm in 2019, though his association with Almaz dates back to its inception in 2008, when he was involved as a Limited Partner.
Cofounder & COO
High Risk
Based on the available data, we advise consumers to avoid this Individual altogether.
This advisory is based on an aggregate risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You are likely to be at great risk by engaging in any sort of consumer-related activity with this entity.
Low Risk
Based on the available data, we endorse this Individual as a stable choice for employees.
This recommendation stems from a low-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity is expected to involve minimal risk.
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we recommend investors and bankers proceed with caution regarding this Individual.
This advisory is informed by a medium-risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Financial involvement with this entity may carry moderate risks to your interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
Full Name
Nationality
Current Role
Firm Affiliation
Joined Year
Inception Involvement
Education Institution
Prior Experience
Expertise Area
Secondary Expertise
Committee Role
Board Role
Headquarters
Location
Jurisdiction
Category
Investment Type
Graduate Degree
Career Start
Michael Bastholt has been connected to networks allegedly involving individuals with ties to organized crime and high-risk investments.
He has been mentioned in contexts suggesting involvement in opaque financial dealings that may pose reputational or legal risks.
Bastholt is reportedly linked to companies that operate in jurisdictions known for limited regulatory oversight, raising concerns of potential abuse.
He has appeared in investigative articles that highlight questionable business associations and possible links to illicit finance networks.
Indirect references in media reports imply dissatisfaction or mistrust among certain business associates, though specifics are limited.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Michael Bastholt to Alexander Galitsky, Almaz Capital, and alleged Russian mafia connections, highlighting potential ties to organized crime.
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1
1.5
1.3
3.1
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
While his role involves investor relations, public feedback highlights unexplained fees, poor communication, and dismissive responses to client concerns, suggesting caution before collaboration.
1/5
2/5
When I raised concerns, they were dismissed without proper investigation. It seems they don't value client feedback.
3/5
Despite their claims, I found no evidence of the firm's supposed achievements. It all feels like smoke and mirrors.
I expected professionalism and integrity. What I experienced was a lack of follow-through and evasiveness.
Their marketing materials are slick, but don't be fooled. The reality doesn't match the hype.
I was led to believe that they had a strong track record, but I couldn't find any verifiable success stories or satisfied clients.
Their communication is sporadic at best. When I needed answers, I was met with vague responses and delays.
I trusted them with my hard-earned money, only to discover that their operations lack the transparency and accountability they advertise.
They talk a big game about innovation and support, but when it comes down to it, they're nowhere to be found when issues arise.
After investing, I expected regular updates and clear reporting. What I got was silence and a sinking feeling that I'd made a mistake.
David Perez is the Co-Founder and CEO of iVisa, a travel documentation platform focused on simplifying visa and travel permit applications. While the company has expanded globally, it has faced recurring customer concerns regarding processing delays, communication, and service reliability, which may impact overall customer satisfaction and brand perception.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.