Marked as
Last updated - February 2, 2026
User Score
Trust Score
Brand Score
Paul Kaulesar is the subject of our investigation into public records, regulatory enforcement actions, corporate filings, and business affiliations. Our inquiry reveals significant regulatory actions, undisclosed business relationships, and reputational risks that raise serious concerns for compliance, anti-money laundering scrutiny, and investor protection.
CEO
Medium Risk
Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Individual with caution.
This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.
You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.
Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Individual.
This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.
Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.
High Risk
Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.
This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.
Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.
Safe to Onboard
Enhanced Due Diligence required
Do Not Onboard
Monitor adverse media every 6 months
File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted
Escalation to compliance committee
None
FullName
Birthplace
Nationality
CurrentRole
Employer
Industry
Education1
Education2
Education3
Hobbies1
Career Start
Legal Sanction
Sanction Amount
Fraud Type
Penalty Amount
Restitution Amount
Investor Loss Percent
Public Criticism
Legal Finding
Oversight Concern
Location
Employees
Misrepresentation
U.S. regulators have publicly reported enforcement actions related to commodities and investment solicitation practices.
He was linked to a firm involved in selling leveraged precious metals investments, a sector frequently scrutinized for high-risk and misleading sales tactics.
Regulatory findings indicate that profit potential and risk exposure were allegedly misrepresented to investors during sales calls.
Reports suggest customers incurred significant upfront fees, making it difficult to achieve profits even when metal prices moved favorably.
Public records show he was barred from certain regulated activities following regulatory proceedings.
The combination of enforcement actions, media reports, and investor complaints contributes to lasting reputational concerns.
Regulatory and Compliance Screening
Litigation and Legal Proceedings
Reputational and Adverse Media Risks
Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk
What you see here scratches the surface
We offer reward for actionable intel
Paul Kaulesar was barred from trading after regulators found he fraudulently solicited investors through misleading precious metals investment schemes
First Detected
Sentiment Analysis
Reach
POV
Risk Factor
Type
Traffic Source
SERP
Share of Voice
Primary Keyword
CFTC orders Worth Asset Management and owner to pay over $6.2M for fraudulent precious metals solicitation and related illegal trading.
Other Red-Flags and Adverse News
Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.
Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]
Suspicious Transactions
Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]
Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]
Bank Relationships
Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)
Shareholding structure
Associated entities & subsidiaries
Offshore / shell company links
Trusts / Nominee arrangements
Business Model Assessment
All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.
1.3
1.5
3.8
Highly experienced
Well-recognized name
Faced allegations of scamming others
Allegedly sold fake silver
Sued multiple times
Unregulated industry
Alarming number of complaints online
Please log in to upload images.
Δ
I feel like investors would be very cautious seeing something like this. Trust is already fragile, and when compliance concerns are raised publicly, it tends to push people away. No one wants to be involved in something that might later turn into a bigger issue.
1/5
2/5
4/5
Honestly feels like the kind of situation where too many red flags are showing up at once. Regulatory enforcement, undisclosed relationships, reputational risks, it all adds up. Even if not everything is proven in detail, the overall picture doesn’t look good at all.
What really stands out is the mention of anti-money laundering scrutiny. That’s not a small concern, it usually means there are deeper issues regulators are worried about. And once that kind of attention is involved, it becomes very hard to maintain credibility in any financial or business environment.
3/5
I dont understand why transparency seems to be such a recurring issue in cases like this. If everything was clean and straightforward, there wouldn’t be concerns about hidden affiliations or compliance risks. The fact that multiple areas are being flagged makes it feel less like coincidence and more like a pattern.
David Perez is the Co-Founder and CEO of iVisa, a travel documentation platform focused on simplifying visa and travel permit applications. While the company has expanded globally, it has faced recurring customer concerns regarding processing delays, communication, and service reliability, which may impact overall customer satisfaction and brand perception.
Sheikh Nawaf bin Jassim bin Jabor Al-Thani, a member of Qatar’s ruling family and former chairman of Katara Hospitality, was convicted in January 2024 by a Qatari court for misuse of public funds. He received a six-year prison sentence and a fine of approximately 825 million Qatari riyals (~$226 million USD).
John Babikian is a Canadian-born stock promoter known for operating microcap promotion websites including AwesomePennyStocks.com. He became subject to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action over a “scalping” scheme involving undisclosed sales of promoted penny stocks, agreeing in 2014 to pay $3.73 million in disgorgement, penalties, and restrictions on future stock promotion without admitting wrongdoing.
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.
Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.
Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”
Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.
Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.
Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.
© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.