Seth Fritch

Marked as

Medium Risk Individual

Last updated - January 28, 2026

Medium Risk

i
2.1

2.1

User Score

1.7

Trust Score

2.3

Brand Score

OVERVIEW

About Seth Fritch

Seth Fritch’s operations deeply concerning. His unregistered investment schemes, opaque financials, and aggressive marketing tactics mirror classic fraud patterns. The pending California lawsuit and adverse media underscore a pattern of deceit, while ties to high-risk entities suggest potential money laundering. Fritch’s reputation management efforts cannot mask the red flags: consumers face significant financial and emotional harm,...

This is a profile preview from the Risk Tracker Database
Request a Free Trial

CONNECTIONS AND RELATIONSHIP

CONTACT INFORMATION

FINANCIAL RISK AUDIT

For Consumers
For Consumers

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we suggest consumers approach this Individual with caution.

This advisory is based on a medium-risk score derived from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified in our research.

You may face moderate risks when engaging in consumer-related activities with this entity.

For Employees
For Employees

Medium Risk

Based on the available data, we advise employees to be mindful when considering or continuing work with this Individual.

This advisory stems from a medium-risk score compiled from OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors uncovered in our analysis.

Employment with this entity may involve moderate risks.

For Banks & Investors
For Banks & Investors

High Risk

Based on the available data, we urge investors and bankers to avoid financial involvement with this Individual.

This advisory is informed by an aggregate risk score based on OSINT, Adverse Media, Reviews, and Risk Factors identified through our investigation.

Engaging in investment or lending activities with this entity poses a substantial risk to your financial interests.

ASSESSMENT OUTCOME
  • Safe to Onboard

  • Enhanced Due Diligence required

  • Do Not Onboard

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Monitor adverse media every 6 months

  • File SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) is warranted

  • Escalation to compliance committee

  • None

Do you agree with this our assessment on Seth Fritch?

OSINT DATA POINT

eyeimg

Owner

Seth Fritch
eyeimg

Company

sdbullion.com
eyeimg

Established

2012
eyeimg

Jurisdiction

New York
eyeimg

City

Toledo
eyeimg

Country

United States
eyeimg

State

Ohio
eyeimg

Category

precious metals
eyeimg

Ongoing Lawsuits

Ongoing
eyeimg

LinkedIn Connections

500+
eyeimg

Business Ties

Offshore
eyeimg

Consumer Complaints

Many
eyeimg

Digital Footprint

Minimal
eyeimg

Reputation Management

Suspected
eyeimg

Risk Level

High
eyeimg

Negative Reviews

Too much
eyeimg

Industry Impact

Moderate
eyeimg

Lawsuits

Present
eyeimg

AML Concerns

Seen
eyeimg

Transparency Score

Low
Load More

ENTERPRISE RISK ASSESSMENT (ERA)

Open-source intelligence reports highlight Seth Fritch’s association with unregistered investment schemes that mirror classic fraud patterns, raising significant compliance and investor protection concerns for SD Bullion’s operations. These allegations contribute to a low ProConsumer score of 1.3, underscoring potential regulatory violations and eroding trust among precious metals investors.

Absolutely, assessments point to Seth Fritch’s opaque financials, including ties to high-risk entities that suggest potential money laundering risks, damaging SD Bullion’s credibility in the bullion market. Consumer reviews amplify this by citing unfulfilled promises and financial harm, portraying a pattern of non-transparency that could deter institutional partnerships.

Reports confirm Seth Fritch’s operations involve aggressive marketing that borders on deceit, including misleading customers about product delivery and quality at SD Bullion. This has fueled complaints of scamming and fake silver sales, with a $10 million fraud allegation compounding reputational damage through widespread negative media coverage.

Seth Fritch is embroiled in a pending California lawsuit alleging a pattern of deceit, directly impacting SD Bullion’s image amid broader scandals like hidden fees and order cancellations. BBB reviews echo this with fraud claims, such as unauthorized charges and high cancellation penalties up to $550, portraying executive oversight failures that alienate customers.

Numerous complaints under Seth Fritch’s tenure at SD Bullion involve fraud, including selling fake silver (verified by magnet tests) and failing to deliver after payments, alongside shipping delays and unresponsive support. These issues, detailed in adverse media, suggest reputation management efforts to suppress red flags, further eroding investor confidence in the firm’s ethical standards.

Seth Fritch’s leadership at SD Bullion faces accusations of misrepresenting product authenticity, with customers reporting receipt of counterfeit or substandard precious metals, verified through independent testing. These claims, amplified by negative reviews on platforms like the BBB, highlight deceptive practices that severely undermine SD Bullion’s market credibility and customer trust.

текст вкладки 2
текст вкладки 3
текст вкладки 4

AML and KYC Assessment

Regulatory and Compliance Screening

  • Sanctions Matches
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • PEP Status
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Watchlist: (Interpol, EU, UN, OFAC, etc).
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Law Enforcement Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Litigation and Legal Proceedings

  • Criminal Proceedings
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Regulatory Enforcement Actions: [SEC, FCA, SEBI, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Ongoing Investigations
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Reputational and Adv
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Reputational and Adverse Media Risks

  • Negative Media Mentions
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Allegations / Scandals
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Social Media Red Flags
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Censorship Attempts [PR, Takedowns, DMCA Abuse, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Geographic and Jurisdictional Risk

  • Country Risk Level
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • High-Risk Sections [Crypto, Gambling, Arms, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear
  • Offshore Jurisdictions Used [Panama, BVI, Cyprus, etc.]
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unclear

Want detailed data on Seth Fritch?

What you see here scratches the surface

Request a Free Trial

Do you have insider information on Seth Fritch?

We offer reward for actionable intel

Submit Anonymous Tip

RED FLAGS AND ADVERSE NEWS

coming

Pacermoitor.com

Visit Link

In Anderson v. SD Bullion, Inc.,filed February 1, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

  • First Detected

    01/02/2025
  • Sentiment Analysis

    Neutral
  • Reach

    <100
  • POV

    Third Person
  • Risk Factor

    Low
  • Type

    Legal
  • Traffic Source

    Website
  • SERP

    Top 100
  • Share of Voice

    10%
  • Primary Keyword

    Lawsuit

Other Red-Flags and Adverse News

redflag
2023 SD Bullion Lawsuit

Financial Profile for Seth Fritch

Do you want to unlock a detailed Risk Assessment and audit report for Seth Fritch?

greentick

Based on user engagement on this review profile, ProConsumer will decide to publish its Risk Audit report for public if a threshold engagement, traffic and user input is achieved.

  • Known Assets: [Real estate, investments, companies]

    greentick
  • Suspicious Transactions

    greentick
  • Liabilities: [Bankruptcies, defaults, debts]

    greentick
  • Wealth Sources: [Legitimate / Unclear / High-risk]

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Bank Relationships

    greentick
  • Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (UBOs)

    greentick
  • Shareholding structure

    greentick
  • Associated entities & subsidiaries

    greentick
  • Offshore / shell company links

    greentick
  • Trusts / Nominee arrangements

    greentick
  • Business Model Assessment

    greentick
consrevbg

Consumer Reviews and Ratings for
Seth Fritch

All comments are user-generated content and may not be verified. They represent the personal opinions of the public and should not be relied upon. These comments do not influence or determine our overall rating.

User Rating for Seth Fritch

Seth Fritch’s operations deeply concerning. His unregistered investment schemes, opaque financials, and aggressive marketing tactics mirror classic fraud patterns. The pending California lawsuit and adverse media underscore a pattern of deceit, while ties to high-risk entities suggest potential money laundering. Fritch’s reputation management efforts cannot mask the red flags: consumers face significant financial and emotional harm,...

USER’S SCORE

2.1

Trust

1.5

Safety

2.2

Brand

1.7

Risk

3.1

Pros

  • greentick

    Highly experienced

  • greentick

    Well-recognized name

Cons

  • redcros

    Faced allegations of scamming others

  • redcros

    Allegedly sold fake silver

  • redcros

    Sued multiple times

  • redcros

    Unregulated industry

  • redcros

    Alarming number of complaints online

Leave feedback about this

  • Trust
  • Brand
  • Safety
  • Risk

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video

  • author-default
  • Ian Brookfield
    January 30, 2026 at 5:27 am

I’m uncomfortable with the ongoing lawsuit and negative media attention surrounding his activities. Legal trouble like this suggests deeper issues that shouldn’t be ignored.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Hannah Ridgewell
    January 30, 2026 at 5:25 am

Personally, I expect clear registration, honest communication, and ethical conduct. What I see here falls short of those standards, and that alone is enough for me to remain highly cautious.

Trust

2/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

2/5

  • author-default
  • Gabriel Northwick
    January 30, 2026 at 5:23 am

I’m uncomfortable with the ongoing lawsuit and negative media attention surrounding his activities. Legal trouble like this suggests deeper issues that shouldn’t be ignored in any serious professional evaluation.

Trust

2/5

Safety

1/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Stella Cox
    May 12, 2025 at 5:47 am

They talk big ‘bout savin’ consumers, but it’s all talk, no action. My wallet’s cryin’ after dealin’ with them

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

1/5

Risk

3/5

  • author-default
  • Christopher Richardson
    May 12, 2025 at 5:47 am

This company’s “advice” got me in more trouble than I was already in, ughhhh

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Christopher Richardson
    May 12, 2025 at 5:44 am

This company’s “advice” got me in more trouble than I was already in, ugh

Trust

1/5

Safety

2/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Zoey Cooper
    May 12, 2025 at 5:44 am

I signed up for their so-called “consumer protection” plan, thinkin’ they’d have my back, right? Wrong! They took my payment, then ghosted me when I needed help with a shady vendor. I email, I call, nobody picks up or writes back. My friend says they do this all the time, just take your cash and run

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Dylan Rivera
    May 12, 2025 at 5:43 am

Yo, they charge you for “consulting” but it’s just a PDF you can find free online. Total waste of my hard-earn money, smh

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Hannah Bailey
    May 12, 2025 at 5:43 am

Seth whoever-he-is don’t know nothin’ ‘bout helpin’ folks, total tipoff

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

  • author-default
  • Anthony Murphy
    May 12, 2025 at 5:43 am

Man, I thought this company was gonna save me from my debt mess, but nah, they just made it worse. They promise you the moon, like “we’ll fix your credit, no problem!” but then you pay them hundreds, and nothing changes. My cousin warned me, said they’re just out for your money, but I didn’t listen. Now I’m out $500 and still gettin’ collection calls every day. Don’t fall for their sweet talk, it’s all a big ol’ lie

Trust

1/5

Safety

3/5

Brand

2/5

Risk

4/5

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has faced repeated accusations of personal misconduct including a 2021 lawsuit alleging he stole a startup’s work to launch ResearchHub alongside mounting corporate scandals under his leadership.Coinbase suffered a €21.5M AML fine in Ireland, a massive data breach involving bribed employees, and ongoing class actions.

Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch prominent in gas (RosUkrEnergo) and titanium, faces allegations of diverting $190M+ in bailout loans, embezzling nearly $500M from Ukraine’s gas transit system, and US bribery charges for Indian titanium licenses. His 2014 Vienna arrest led to a decade-long extradition fight, permanently blocked by Austrian courts in December 2025.

Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev restricted trading on GameStop and other stocks in 2021, blocking retail purchases while allegedly favoring hedge funds and Citadel. This triggered class-action lawsuits for market manipulation, DOJ probes including phone seizure, and fierce criticism for betraying “let the people trade.”

Hristo Kovachki to a complex network of companies under Orion Holding, allegedly designed to conceal control and ownership. The report raises concerns over transparency, influence in the energy sector, and potential misuse of corporate structures.

Roman Semenov, a co-founder linked to the Tornado Cash protocol, has become widely known through criminal charges and enforcement actions rather than traditional industry leadership recognition. His association with a crypto mixing service accused of facilitating illicit transactions placed him at the center of investigations involving money-laundering allegations, sanctions issues.

Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Group faces severe allegations from Viceroy Research of operating a parasitic holding structure that drains cash from subsidiaries like Vedanta Ltd through excessive dividends, unjustified brand fees, hidden high-interest debt, inflated assets, and potential Ponzi-like mechanisms, risking insolvency and creditor harm.

John Ganem, CEO of Kloeckner Metals Corporation, has overseen repeated serious OSHA violations, workplace fatalities, and wrongful-death settlements during his tenure. Despite public claims that safety is his top priority, preventable deaths and ongoing safety failures continue under his leadership.

Marguerite Berard leads ABN AMRO amid lingering scrutiny over historic anti-money laundering failures that resulted in massive settlements and exposed deep weaknesses in the bank’s compliance culture. Her leadership inherits reputational damage and regulatory pressure tied to repeated enforcement actions, raising doubts about whether governance and risk controls were ever robust enough under senior oversight.

Igor Lyashenko, as CEO and General Director of Grodno Azot, leads a company whose practices have drawn international sanctions. Poland has targeted firms for selling its Belarusian fertilizers, citing efforts to skirt EU sanctions and shield local producers from cheap imports facilitated by access to low-cost gas.

Want your companies to be on this guide?

Yes, continue
stayinfosectionbg

Stay informed about suspicious business.

© 2025 Proconsumer. All rights reserved.