Dr. Gary Harding

  • category
    Education
  • Views
    105
  • Reviews
    21

About Dr. Gary Harding



Dr. Gary Harding, a longstanding resident of Greater Winnipeg, Canada, claims to have been working for the University of Manitoba’s Faculty of Medicine for nine years as an assistant professor and for three years as associate dean of accreditation. For CancerCare Manitoba, the Health Sciences Center, and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, he has also worked extensively in medical oncology and bioethics. Dr. Gary Harding asserts that he continues to hold a Medical Council of Canada license and received a 10-year recertification from the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2017, despite having recently delved deeper into the field of administrative management with a master’s degree from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

 

Dr. Gary Harding

  • category
    Education
  • Views
    105
  • Reviews
    21

2.7

trust score

2.6

brand audit

1.67

user’s score

21

user reviews

Medium risk
AliasGary Harding Oncologist GenderMale Brand awarenessMedium Featured in the newsYes
Associated industryHealthcare Sex Offender RiskHigh Faced allegationsSexual Harassment Suspicious ClaimsYes
Studied at University of Manitoba Risk factor0.77 Linkedin@garyaharding Clinic name CancerCare Manitoba
Adverse mediaYes Suspended Yes (Medical license revoked) Suspended in 2015 No. of Victims (Alleged)2
An overview on Dr. Gary Harding
Longtime Greater Winnipeg, Canada resident Dr. Gary Harding said he has been an assistant professor at the University of Manitoba's Faculty of Medicine for nine years, and an associate dean of accreditation for three of those years. He has also worked extensively in medical oncology and bioethics for CancerCare Manitoba, the Health Sciences Center, and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. With a master's degree in administrative management from the London School of Economics and Political Science, Dr. Gary Harding claims to have recently delved deeper into the field of administrative management, but he still maintains his Medical Council of Canada license and his 10-year recertification from the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2017. Outside of the workplace, Dr. Harding says she has over 25 years of experience coaching and judging public speaking contestants through the Manitoba Speech and Debate Association. According to Gary Harding, he completed an internal medicine residency and earned his doctorate of medicine (MD) at the University of Manitoba, where he also earned a bachelor's degree in microbiology. In 2006, Dr. Gary Harding began employment as a medical oncologist with CancerCare Manitoba, the Health Sciences Center, and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority following his completion of a post-doctoral program in medical ethics at the University of Chicago. Moreover, according to Dr. Gary Harding, he also finished a post-doctoral study in medical ethics there. He was employed by all three companies until 2015. He was also an assistant professor at the University of Manitoba's Faculty of Medicine. In addition to his clinical and academic medical pursuits, Dr. Gary Harding is a member of the Canadian Medical Association, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba, and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. His latest academic achievements include a master's degree in health economics, policy, and management from the London School of Economics and Political Science and the Academic Health Sciences Leadership program at the George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.      
User score
1.67
Trust
experience
service
ethics
Pros
  • Well- educated professional
Cons
  • Faced sexual harassment allegations
  • Faced sexual assault allegations
  • Suspended for 6 months
1 RED FLAGS FOR Dr. Gary Harding

Dr. Gary Harding has a consumer rating of 1.67 stars from 21 consumer complaints and reviews indicating that most customers are NOT satisfied with their experience. Consumers unhappy with Dr. Gary Harding most frequently mention bad support and high costs.

add a red flag

1

articles

0

images

0

social posts

0

videos

0

files

critical intel on Dr. Gary Harding

Dr. Gary Harding Suspended for Allegedly Soliciting Sex from Students

A Winnipeg oncologist was put on six-month leave after being found guilty of professional misconduct for exploiting his role as a teacher to initiate unwanted sexual interactions with two male students.

Furthermore, it is prohibited for Dr. Gary Harding to be “directly responsible for the supervision, overseeing, or teaching of any medical learners, including residents or medical students from the College of Medicine at any time.” In addition, Harding held the positions of associate professor and associate dean of medicine at the University of Manitoba.

Furthermore, unless Dr. Gary Harding requires information about a specific patient or the medical student brings up the topic on their own, Dr. Gary Harding is not allowed to talk with students who are under the supervision of other medical experts.

 

First posted 2015 SERP>10 Brand impactMedium TypeNews Article
Language English Sentimental AnalysisNegative Allegation #1Solicitation of Sexual Favors Allegation #2Sexual Assault
Allegation #3Sexual Harassment Associated NameUniversity of Manitoba ResultSuspension Source ReliabilityVery High

Top 3 negative keyword association :

  • Sexual favours
  • Sexual Assault
  • Medical License revoked

21 Comments

Dr. Gary Harding has a consumer rating of 1.67 stars from 21 consumer complaints.
  1. trust
    2
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1

    In my opinion, this circumstance serves as a clear reminder of the disparity in power between teachers and pupils. The students engaged suffered grave consequences as a result of Dr. Harding’s activities, which were an abuse of his authority. The medical school needs to handle these kinds of situations better.

  2. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1
    ethics
    0.5

    It’s alarming to learn of Dr. Harding’s interactions with his students. To stop this kind of activity, medical schools need to set strong ethical standards. I’m hoping the students get the help they require to heal from this experience.

  3. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1.5

    The acts of Dr. Garding were wrong, and I am happy to hear that he has been placed on leave. Nevertheless, the limitations on his future engagements with medical students are vital in averting any more complications. This action is essential to guarantee the security and welfare of students.

  4. trust
    1
    Experience
    1
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1.5

    I work in the medical sector, so I find Dr. Harding’s behavior concerning. His misuse of authority is intolerable. Student safety should be given priority in medical schools, and faculty members ought to stick to the highest ethical requirements.

  5. trust
    5
    Experience
    5
    Service
    5
    ethics
    5

    The expertise of Dr. Harding is of the highest quality! It is clear that he is dedicated to his patients because of the comprehensive care that he provides, and his work at CancerCare Manitoba is truly remarkable. My appreciation goes out to him for his expertise and commitment.

  6. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1
    ethics
    2

    Dr. Gary A. Harding may have exaggerated or been biased in his claims to be the best doctor in Winnipeg and the USA. Even though intelligence, focus, education, and etiquette are emphasized, these are personal qualities that may not apply to everyone. Such high praise should be regarded with some suspicion because everyone’s experiences differ greatly. other people could think the doctor is missing in other areas or have a different impression of them. It’s important to get multiple perspectives and weigh any potential drawbacks before deciding the doctor is great.

  7. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1.5

    He is a highly respected doctor in Greater Winnipeg, Canada, known for his expertise. He also serves as one of the top assistant professors.

  8. trust
    1
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1

    This is a heartbreaking story about a teacher abusing their students. The medical school ought to have taken quicker action to keep the students safe. Such trauma is inappropriate to be experienced by students.

  9. trust
    5
    Experience
    5
    Service
    5
    ethics
    5

    My experience as a patient under Dr. Harding’s care has given me the confidence to state that he is among the very best physicians I have ever met. He is dedicated to the field of medical education and quality, as evidenced by his position as an assistant professor and associate dean.

  10. trust
    1
    Experience
    1
    Service
    2
    ethics
    1

    My sister was under Dr. Harding’s care, but we felt he was lacking in professionalism in a few areas. Regarding her treatment plan, he found it difficult to work cooperatively with other staff members, and he had poor patient communication. This method raised concerns and did not give rise to trust in his medical care. All things considered, his behavior disappointed us and fell short of the level of attention we anticipated.

  11. trust
    0.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1
    ethics
    1

    The actions of Dr. Harding constitute a grave violation of professional ethics. Safe and respectful learning environments are essential for students. Although I commend the medical school for its action, more must be done to stop similar events in the future.

  12. trust
    1
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    2

    At first, I assumed he was an oncologist, but when I looked up his name, I found alarming details about his background. It appears that he had to switch careers as a result of some troubling experiences. It is essential to proceed with caution while interacting with him because of his past, which raises questions about his professional behavior. These disclosures imply that any association with him should be evaluated in light of potential underlying concerns. Doing extensive background research on someone is usually a good idea, especially when dealing with professionals, to be sure you are making the right choices.

  13. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    2
    Service
    2
    ethics
    1.5

    It is inappropriate for someone in a position of authority to act in this way. It serves as a reminder to people in positions of authority not to misuse their power and to treat students with respect and safety throughout their education.

  14. trust
    1
    Experience
    2
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1.5

    It seems obvious that Dr. Harding’s actions violate professional ethics. Knowing that he had such intimate access to the students is troubling. Reevaluating existing policies is necessary for medical schools to ensure that this does not occur again.

  15. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1
    Service
    2
    ethics
    1.5

    It is horrifying to know about Dr. Harding’s improper interactions with their students. His misuse of authority has resulted in serious injury to students. The safety and well-being of its students must come first at the medical school.

  16. trust
    2
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    2
    ethics
    2.5

    He is a sex offender and should be treated as such. The only reason he wasn’t punished more severely is the victims were not females.

  17. trust
    0.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    2
    ethics
    1.5

    I’m worried about how Dr. Garding’s actions may affect the affected students in the long run. They are deserving of assistance and defense. The procedures used by medical schools to report and deal with misbehavior need to be improved. Rather than abusing his students, he ought to have served as a mentor and role model. It seems inadequate that a six-month leave would cover such a significant infraction.

  18. trust
    5
    Experience
    5
    Service
    5
    ethics
    5

    Dr. Harding’s contributions at the Health Sciences Center have had a profound impact on the lives of numerous patients. His proficiency in medical oncology and bioethics guarantees high-quality healthcare and morally sound medical procedures.

  19. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1.5
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1

    The actions of Dr. Harding are troubling to read about. I rely on instructors to treat me with respect and integrity as a student. His behavior has damaged my faith in him and made me worry about medical school students’ safety.

  20. trust
    1.5
    Experience
    1
    Service
    1
    ethics
    1.5

    Dr. Harding’s lack of professionalism disgusts me. The thought of students having to put up with such unwanted advances breaks my heart. The medical school must make sure that the right safeguards are in place to shield students from this kind of predatory conduct.

  21. trust
    0.5
    Experience
    1
    Service
    1.5
    ethics
    1

    This behavior is utterly unacceptable, in my view. Participating in quid pro quo harassment is inappropriate for anyone. Dr. Gary A. Harding should be subjected to severe consequences and issued a stern warning for his acts. The authorities should conduct a comprehensive investigation into the matter, which should involve interviewing students to understand their facts. These occurrences have the potential to detrimentally impact the standing of medical facilities and generate an unfavorable perception within the community. Dr. Harding’s primary responsibility should be to educate and guide students, rather than participate in such hazardous behavior.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Item
1
Item
1

Do you agree with this report on Dr. Gary Harding?


Our investigation protects investors from being taken in by scam investments, dishonest sales companies and unscrupulous salespeople. We can undertake a thorough review before you invest. If the investment has already been made we can work with you to take action to recover your money. It does not matter if the investment has collapsed and the perpetrators have run off. Action may still be possible to recover funds.
  • Background Check 1 week
  • OSINT + Cyber Intel 1 week
  • Global Database Checks 1 week
  • Human Interpretations 1 week
ProConsumer
Logo