trust score
brand audit
user’s score
user reviews
AliasDr. Paul MacKoul | Brand AwarenessNone | Featured in the newsYes | Received Negative Reviews OnlineYes |
Faced Allegation #1Misconduct | Faced Allegation #2 Negligence | Faced Allegation #3Responsible for a Patient's Death | Associated industryHealthcare |
Studied atUniversity of North Carolina | Risk factor0.59 | Social media @paulmackoulmd | Linkedin @drpaulmackoul |
Clinic nameCenter for Innovative GYN Care | Gender Male | Adverse mediaNone | Suspicious claimsYes |
Accused in 2008 |
Dr. Paul MacKoul has a consumer rating of 1.5 stars from 1 consumer complaints and reviews indicating that most customers are NOT satisfied with their experience. Consumers unhappy with Dr. Paul MacKoul most frequently mention bad support and high costs.
articles
images
social posts
videos
files
On February 17, 2009, a patient filed a complaint with the Board, accusing appellant Dr. Paul MacKoul of misconduct. On January 17, 2012, the Board accused Dr. MacKoul of acting improperly while practicing medicine in violation of Maryland law.
Dr. MacKoul is a board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist with specialization in laparoscopic surgery. He was charged under the same laws for his illegal behavior concerning another patient.
Dr. Paul MacKoul was found to have behaved impolitely with the patient by the Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”), who gave a proposed judgment on March 12, 2013, following a two-day hearing. On June 3, 2014, the Board issued a Final Decision and Order, reprimanding Dr. Paul MacKoul and requiring him to complete a comprehensive course on physician-patient relations. This followed the Board’s approval of the exceptions at an Exceptions Hearing on July 24, 2013, which was permitted by the Board.
First Posted2008 | SERP>10 | ReliabilityMedium | Brand impactNone |
TypeReviews | Sentimental AnalysisNegative | LanguageEnglish | Allegation #1Negligence |
Allegation #2Misconduct | Allegation #3Illicit Activities | Search VisibilityLow | Source ReliabilityHigh |
Top 3 negative keyword association :
Already have an account? login
This guy should be barred permanently. Why is he still allowed?!!!