trust score
brand audit
userās score
user reviews
Founded On 2016 | FounderCollin Plume | HeadquartersGreater Los Angeles Area, West Coast, Western US | LinkedIncompany/noble-gold-investments |
Facebook/noblegold/ | Twitter@NobleGoldIRA | Instagram@noblegoldinvestments | Crunchbase@noble-gold-investments |
YouTubechannel/UCeg7zXQdLQGDiTvVoQYlE4g | Related IndustryPrecious Metals | SpecializationIndividual Retirement Accounts | Money Laundering RiskGold and Silver Investments |
Customer Support QualityLow | Conflict of Interest RiskMedium | Regulatory Action RiskHigh | Negligence RiskHigh |
Risk Factor0.37 | Brand AwarenessHigh | Misleading Promotional IssuesYes | Received Negative Review Status?Yes |
Noble Gold Investments has a consumer rating of N/A stars from 0 consumer complaints and reviews indicating that most customers are NOT satisfied with their experience. Consumers unhappy with Noble Gold Investments most frequently mention bad support and high costs.
articles
images
social posts
videos
files
According to the evaluation, Noble Gold Investments apologized for any confusion or unhappiness caused by the lack of clear price information. They expressed regret if their communication was inadequate and understood the need to giveĀ customers thorough information. They understood the need for competitive pricing and promised to study their procedures to make future dealings more open and honest. They reiterated their commitment to fixing the problems and rebuilding trust and urged further conversation.
Posted date Feb 15, 2024 | Rated1 out of 5-stars | SERP>10 | Search VisibilityLow |
Brand Impact Medium | LanguageEnglish | Sense of ExperienceNegative |
Top 3 negative keyword association :
According to the review up above, the first-time precious metals buyers felt their adviser was taking advantage of them, calling him a “snakey sales guy.” Upon getting their first account, they were taken aback by the substantial decline in the value of their investment, which was mainly caused by the high premium they had paid. According to a subsequent study, they should have paid a premium of 2% to 5% for gold, but they paid more than 10%. The same holdsĀ for silver; contrary to their analysis, they paid over 16%. That being the case, they said they would never entrust the company with another transaction.
Posted DateOct 31, 2023 | Rated1 out of 5-stars | SERP>10 | Search VisibilityLow |
Brand Impact Medium | LanguageEnglish | Sentiment AnalysisNegative |
Top 3 negative keyword association :
Already have an account? login
Leave a Reply